Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16086183›Full record

ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2006

Apoptosis in infectious disease: how bacteria interfere with the apoptotic apparatus.

Georg Häcker, Susanne Kirschnek, Silke F Fischer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georg HäckerInstitute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University Munich, Trogerstr. 9, 81675 Munich, Germany. hacker@lrz.tum.de
Susanne Kirschnek
Silke F Fischer
Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell death by apoptosis is a common response of a human cell to many extrinsic stimuli. A cell's sensitivity to apoptotic triggers is affected by its activation and differentiation status. Bacteria are recognised by cellular receptors and elicit a multitude of signal transduction events that can, among other effects, alter the cell's response towards apoptotic stimuli. Many different bacteria and bacterial products have been recognised as agents that can act in this way and either induce or inhibit cell death. Besides these common and, as we argue, indirect activities, chlamydiae have been described to have a more specific capacity. These specialists of intracellular life can directly attack the host cell's apoptotic pathway. Here, we will attempt to structure the field of bacterial inhibition of apoptosis and discuss recent advancements in our knowledge of how chlamydiae interfere with the host cell's capacity to undergo apoptosis.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBacteriaBacterial InfectionsChlamydiaHumans

Identifiers

PMID16086183
OpenAlexW2087601381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.