Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16085907›Full record

ArticleClinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology2005

Critical evaluation of urine-based PCR assay for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Carolin Rauter, Markus Mueller, Isabel Diterich, Sabine Zeller, Dieter Hassler, Thomas Meergans, Thomas Hartung

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Chronic Lyme disease.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Novel Diagnosis of Lyme Disease: Potential for CAM Intervention.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2009
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carolin RauterBiochemical Pharmacology, Faculty of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Markus Mueller
Isabel Diterich
Sabine Zeller
Dieter Hassler
Thomas Meergans
Thomas Hartung

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many approaches were made in recent years to establish urine PCR as a diagnostic tool for Lyme borreliosis, but results are contradictory. In the present study, a standardized protocol spiking urine from healthy donors with a defined amount of whole Borrelia or Borrelia DNA was established. The development of a nested real-time PCR targeting ospA enabled a highly sensitive and quantitative analysis of these samples. We show the following. (i) Storage of spiked urine samples for up to 6 months at--20 degrees C had no negative effect on spike recovery. (ii) Centrifugation of 10 ml of urine at 40,000 x g for 30 min resulted in a concentration of both spikes, i.e., whole Borrelia and DNA. (iii) The inhibition of DNA spike recovery in 48% (11 of 23 samples) of urine samples tested could be attributed to nuclease activity. This was abrogated by alkalizing the urine or by working with the samples on ice. Despite optimized conditions, analysis of urine samples of 12 patients with erythema migrans, the clinical stage considered to be associated with the highest bacterial load, revealed a positive result in only one sample. All 12 samples were negative by an alternative PCR targeting flagellin. The results of our study support doubts that urine is a suitable material for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBase SequenceBorrelia burgdorferi GroupChildDNA, BacterialFemaleHumansLyme DiseaseMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16085907
PMCPMC1182183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.