Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16085903›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2005

Specificity of a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron marker for human feces.

C Andrew Carson, Jessica M Christiansen, Helen Yampara-Iquise, Verel W Benson, Claire Baffaut, Jerri V Davis, Robert R Broz, William B Kurtz, Wendi M Rogers, William H Fales

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Highly Specific Sewage-DerivedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Application of Faecalibacterium 16S rDNA genetic marker for accurate identification of duck faeces.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evolutionary transitions in bacterial symbiosis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

C Andrew CarsonDept. of Veterinary Pathobiology, 201 Connaway Hall, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA. carsonc@missouri.edu
Jessica M Christiansen
Helen Yampara-Iquise
Verel W Benson
Claire Baffaut
Jerri V Davis
Robert R Broz
William B Kurtz
Wendi M Rogers
William H Fales

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A bacterial primer set, known to produce a 542-bp amplicon specific for Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, generated this product in PCR with 1 ng of extracted DNA from 92% of 25 human fecal samples, 100% of 20 sewage samples, and 16% of 31 dog fecal samples. The marker was not detected in 1 ng of fecal DNA from 61 cows, 35 horses, 44 pigs, 24 chickens, 29 turkeys, and 17 geese.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticBacteroidesCattleDNA, BacterialDogsFecesGenetic MarkersHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySewageWater PollutionDNA, BacterialGenetic MarkersSewage

Identifiers

PMID16085903
PMCPMC1183297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.