Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16085765›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2005

Ligand-induced DNA condensation: choosing the model.

Vladimir B Teif

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Herpes virus genome, the pressure is on.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2013
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Vladimir B TeifLaboratory of Nucleoprotein Biophysics and Biochemistry, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Belarus National Academy of Sciences, Minsk, Belarus.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We test and compare different models for ligand-induced DNA condensation. Using 14C-labeled spermidine3+, we measure the binding to condensed DNA at micromolar to molar polyamine concentrations. DNA aggregates at a critical polyamine concentration. Spermidine3+ binding becomes highly cooperative at the onset of aggregation. At higher concentrations, spermidine3+ binding to condensed DNA reaches a plateau with the degree of binding equal to 0.7 (NH(4+)/PO3-). Condensed DNA exists in a wide range of spermidine concentrations with the roughly constant degree of ligand binding. At greater concentrations, the degree of binding increases again. Further spermidine penetration between the double helices causes DNA resolubilization. We show that a simple two-state model without ligand-ligand interactions qualitatively predicts the reentrant aggregation-resolubilization behavior and the dependence on the ligand, Na+, and DNA concentrations. However, such models are inconsistent with the cooperative ligand binding to condensed DNA. Including the contact or long-range ligand-ligand interactions improves the coincidence with the experiments, if binding to condensed DNA is slightly more cooperative than to the starting DNA. For example, in the contact interaction model it is equivalent to an additional McGhee-von Hippel cooperativity parameter of approximately 2. Possible physical mechanisms for the observed cooperativity of ligand binding are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalModels, MolecularComputer SimulationDNAMacromolecular SubstancesNucleic Acid ConformationSpermidineDNAMacromolecular SubstancesSpermidine

Identifiers

PMID16085765
PMCPMC1366757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.