Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16083262›Full record

ReviewJournal of proteome research

The sentinel within: exploiting the immune system for cancer biomarkers.

Karen S Anderson, Joshua LaBaer

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of proteome research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 144 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
144citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

144 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 305 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Serum autoantibodies in the early detection of esophageal cancer: a systematic review.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multiplexed Detection of Autoantibodies to Glycopeptides Using Microarray.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Microbiomics Analysis of Antimicrobial Antibody Response between Patients with Lung Cancer and Control Subjects with Benign Pulmonary Nodules.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

84 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen S AndersonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Joshua LaBaer
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Variation in Receptor Tyrosine Kinases and Breast Cancer RiskP50CA089393 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS, LYNDSAY NORINE · 2000 to 2009
$28.8M
Biomarker Detection Using NAPPA Tumor Antigen ArraysU01CA117374 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI ANDERSON, KAREN SUE, LABAER, JOSHUA · 2005 to 2015
$6.2M
Functional Proteomics of Breast CancerR33CA099191 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI LABAER, JOSHUA · 2004 to 2006
$2.2M
MEASUREMENT OF CTL RESPONSES TO HUMAN PAPILLOMA VIRUSK08CA088444 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI ANDERSON, KAREN SUE · 2000 to 2005
$634k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA088444NCI NIH HHS K08 CA 88444-03NCI NIH HHS P50 CA089393NCI NIH HHS P50 CA 89393-05NCI NIH HHS R33 CA099191NCI NIH HHS R33 CA 099191-02NCI NIH HHS U01 CA117374
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The release of proteins from tumors triggers an immune response in cancer patients. These tumor antigens arise from several mechanisms including tumor-specific alterations in protein expression, mutation, folding, degradation, or intracellular localization. Responses to most tumor antigens are rarely observed in healthy individuals, making the response itself a biomarker that betrays the presence of underlying cancer. Antibody immune responses show promise as clinical biomarkers because antibodies have long half-lives in serum, are easy to measure, and are stable in blood samples. However, our understanding of the specificity and the impact of the immune response in early stages of cancer is limited. The immune response to cancer, whether endogenous or driven by vaccines, involves highly specific T lymphocytes (which target tumor-derived peptides bound to self-MHC proteins) and B lymphocytes (which generate antibodies to tumor-derived proteins). T cell target antigens have been identified either by expression cloning from tumor cDNA libraries, or by prediction based on patterns of antigen expression ("reverse immunology"). B cell targets have been similarly identified using the antibodies in patient sera to screen cDNA libraries derived from tumor cell lines. This review focuses on the application of recent advances in proteomics for the identification of tumor antigens. These advances are opening the door for targeted vaccine development, and for using immune response signatures as biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and monitoring.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, TumorHumansImmune SystemMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesAntigens, NeoplasmAutoantibodiesBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID16083262
PMCPMC2522321
OpenAlexW2157533109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.