Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16082528›Full record

Trial reportDiabetologia2005

Adverse effects of left ventricular hypertrophy in the reduction of endpoints in NIDDM with the angiotensin II antagonist losartan (RENAAL) study.

G Boner, M E Cooper, K McCarroll, B M Brenner, D de Zeeuw, P R Kowey, S Shahinfar, T Dickson, R S Crow, H-H Parving and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Diabetologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension-induced left ventricular hypertrophy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy in the presence of left anterior fascicular block: a reexamination of the 2009 AHA/ACCF/HRS guidelines.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2013
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diabetic cardiomyopathy.Clinical science (London, England : 1979) · 2009
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

G BonerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, University of Tel Aviv, Ramat Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel. gboner1@barak-online.net
M E Cooper
K McCarroll
B M Brenner
D de Zeeuw
P R Kowey
S Shahinfar
T Dickson
R S Crow
H-H Parving
RENAAL Investigators
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USTel Aviv University · ILSteno Diabetes Centers · DKUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe explored the impact of baseline left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and losartan treatment on renal and cardiovascular (CV) events in 1,513 patients from the Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan (RENAAL) trial, which studied the effects of losartan on the progression of renal disease and/or death in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. MATERIALS AND

methodsLVH was assessed using ECG criteria (Cornell product and/or Sokolow-Lyon voltage). The risk of renal or CV events was determined by a proportional hazards model fit with treatment allocation and presence of LVH. Covariates at baseline included age, sex, systolic BP, mean arterial pressure, pulse, proteinuria, serum creatinine, albumin and haemoglobin.

resultsA total of 187 subjects (12%) had LVH at baseline. Treatment with losartan resulted in a significant decrease in the Cornell product (-6.2%) and Sokolow-Lyon voltage (-6.3%). LVH was shown to be significantly associated with the primary endpoint, which was a composite of doubling of serum creatinine (DSCR), endstage renal disease (ESRD) or death (hazard ratio [HR]=1.44, p=0.011), as well as with the composite renal endpoint of DSCR/ESRD (HR=1.42, p=0.031) and CV events (HR=1.68, p=0.001). Losartan treatment of patients with LVH decreased the CV as well as renal risk to a level similar to that of patients without LVH. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy, LVH is associated with significantly increased risk of CV events and the progression of kidney disease. Importantly, in patients with LVH, losartan reduced the CV as well as the renal risk to a level similar to that seen in subjects without LVH.

Indexed as

AgedAngiotensin IIAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesDouble-Blind MethodElectrocardiographyEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHumansHypertrophy, Left VentricularLosartanMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin IIAntihypertensive AgentsLosartan

Identifiers

PMID16082528
OpenAlexW2116981106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.