ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005
Pilot study to evaluate microarray hybridization as a tool for Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain differentiation.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- High-throughput microarray technology in diagnostics of enterobacteria based on genome-wide probe selection and regression analysis.BMC genomics · 2010Article
- Broad spectrum microarray for fingerprint-based bacterial species identification.BMC biotechnology · 2010Article
- Poultry-associated Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar 4,12:d:- reveals high clonality and a distinct pathogenicity gene repertoire.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2009Article
- Development of an oligonucleotide microarray method for Salmonella serotyping.Microbial biotechnology · 2008Article
- Microarray for molecular typing of Salmonella enterica serovars.Molecular and cellular probes · 2008Article
- Probe hybridization array typing: a binary typing method for Escherichia coli.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In developed countries, Salmonella enterica subspecies 1 serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium range among the most common causes of bacterial food-borne infections. The surveillance and typing of epidemic Salmonella strains are important tools in epidemiology. Usually, Salmonella enterica subspecies 1 serovars are differentiated by serotyping for diagnostic purposes. Further differentiation is done by phage typing as well as molecular typing techniques. Here we have designed and evaluated a prototype DNA microarray as a tool for serovar Typhimurium strain differentiation. It harbors 83 serovar Typhimurium probes obtained by differential subtractive hybridization and from the public database. The microarray yielded reproducible hybridization patterns in repeated hybridizations with chromosomal DNA of the same strain and could differentiate five serovar Typhimurium reference strains (DT204, DT104, DT208, DT36, and LT2). Furthermore, the microarray identified two distinct groups among 13 serovar Typhimurium DT104 strains. This correlated with observations from pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Twenty-three further serovar Typhimurium strains were analyzed to explore future directions for optimization of the simple 83-probe DNA microarray. The data presented here demonstrate that DNA microarrays harboring small numbers of selected probes are promising tools for serovar Typhimurium strain typing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.