ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005
Results of disk diffusion testing with cefoxitin correlate with presence of mecA in Staphylococcus spp.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ecological Dynamics ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Distribution and characteristics of methicillin-resistant staphylococci from non-clinical environments in southern Vietnam.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Trends, Seasonality, and the Impact of COVID-19 on ClinicalAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning-selected minimal features drive high-accuracy rule-based antibiotic susceptibility predictions forMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial resistance ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Article
- Emerging Challenges in Methicillin Resistance of Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Detecting antibiotic resistance: classical, molecular, advanced bioengineering, and AI-enhanced approaches.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Characterization and complete genome sequence of highly lytic phage active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolated from Egypt.Virology journal · 2024Article
- Multidrug-ResistantVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Phenotypic and Genotypic Characterization of Methicillin Resistance inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Differentiating methicillin resistant and susceptibleFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of in-house cefoxitin screening broth to determine methicillin-resistant staphylococci.Heliyon · 2022Article
- Differentiating necrotizing soft tissue infections from cellulitis by soft tissue infectious fluid analysis: a pilot study.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2022Article
- Article
- The Genotype-to-Phenotype Dilemma: How Should Laboratories Approach Discordant Susceptibility Results?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Review
- Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance of BacteriaAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Study of biofilm formation, structure and antibiotic resistance inNew microbes and new infections · 2021Article
- Molecular detection of methicillin heat-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in pasteurized camel milk in Saudi Arabia.Bioscience reports · 2020Article
- Phage-Mediated Molecular Detection (PMMD): A Novel Rapid Method for Phage-Specific Bacterial Detection.Viruses · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cefoxitin disk diffusion (DD) test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci was assessed during a three-phase study. In phase 1, one laboratory tested 62 and 53 strains of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), respectively. These data were used to choose the provisional cefoxitin DD breakpoints (resistant/susceptible) of < or =19 mm/> or =20 mm for S. aureus and < or =24 mm/> or =25 mm for CoNS for the next phase of testing. In phase 2, 10 laboratories each tested approximately 40 in-house strains of staphylococci (half of which were S. aureus) using Mueller-Hinton agar from different manufacturers. In this phase, the sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of the cefoxitin disk test were 98 and 100% for S. aureus and 99 and 96% for CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test performed equivalently to oxacillin broth microdilution (BMD) and to oxacillin DD tests among S. aureus and mecA-positive CoNS strains but gave better results than oxacillin BMD or oxacillin DD for mecA-negative strains of CoNS. The cefoxitin DD test also was much easier to read and did not require the use of transmitted light for detection of resistance. Based on data from the first two phases, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI; formerly NCCLS) adopted the use of the cefoxitin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in staphylococci and revised Table 2C in CLSI document M100-S14 to reflect the change. In the third phase, an additional 61 challenge strains of CoNS for which the oxacillin MICs were 0.5 to 2 microg/ml were tested in a single laboratory to determine the effectiveness of the cefoxitin DD test for this group of borderline-resistant isolates. These data were used to refine the description of the test in CLSI document M100-S15. The cefoxitin DD test is preferred over the oxacillin DD test for predicting mecA-mediated oxacillin resistance in S. aureus and CoNS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.