SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2005
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Ultrasound Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain
The Use of Myofascial Release in Lumbopelvic Pain
Osteopathic Evaluation on Patients With Non-specific Back Pain: An Observational Inter-examiner Reliability Study
Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapies on Functional Outcome in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain at 3 Months : a Randomised Controlled Trial
Electroencephalography Activity in Individuals With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain After Cranial Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial
Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Addition to Standard Pharmacological Treatment in Fibromyalgia : A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Muscle energy technique for non-specific low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2014Pooled it
- Osteopathic intervention in chronic non-specific low back pain: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2013Pooled it
- Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Osteopathy for musculoskeletal pain patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Clinical rheumatology · 2011Pooled it
- A systematic review on the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine for chronic non-specific low-back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2010Pooled it
- Effect of osteopathic techniques on human resting muscle tone in healthy subjects using myotonometry: a factorial randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Immediate effects of a lumbar spine manipulation on pain sensitivity and postural control in individuals with nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.Chiropractic & manual therapies · 2020Trial
- A randomized control trial to determine the effectiveness and physiological effects of spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization compared to each other and a sham condition in patients with chronic low back pain: Study protocol for The RELIEF Study.Contemporary clinical trials · 2018Trial
- Impact of osteopathic treatment on pain in adult patients with cystic fibrosis--a pilot randomized controlled study.PloS one · 2014Trial
- Osteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.Annals of family medicineTrial
- A mechanistic hypothesis: osteopathic manipulative therapy may modulate immune cell function in chronic low back pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The efficacy of mechanical spinal manipulation in the standing position in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Article
- Self-Administered Traction as an Adjunct in the Chiropractic Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Case Report.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Effectiveness of Osteopathic Treatment on the Spinal Column as Measured by the Spinal Mouse®: A Case Series.Cureus · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a distinctive modality commonly used by osteopathic physicians to complement their conventional treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Previous reviews and meta-analyses of spinal manipulation for low back pain have not specifically addressed OMT and generally have focused on spinal manipulation as an alternative to conventional treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of OMT as a complementary treatment for low back pain.
methodsComputerized bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, MANTIS, OSTMED, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were supplemented with additional database and manual searches of the literature. Six trials, involving eight OMT vs control treatment comparisons, were included because they were randomized controlled trials of OMT that involved blinded assessment of low back pain in ambulatory settings. Data on trial methodology, OMT and control treatments, and low back pain outcomes were abstracted by two independent reviewers. Effect sizes were computed using Cohen's d statistic and meta-analysis results were weighted by the inverse variance of individual comparisons. In addition to the overall meta-analysis, stratified meta-analyses were performed according to control treatment, country where the trial was conducted, and duration of follow-up. Sensitivity analyses were performed for both the overall and stratified meta-analyses.
resultsOverall, OMT significantly reduced low back pain (effect size, -0.30; 95% confidence interval, -0.47 - -0.13; P = .001). Stratified analyses demonstrated significant pain reductions in trials of OMT vs active treatment or placebo control and OMT vs no treatment control. There were significant pain reductions with OMT regardless of whether trials were performed in the United Kingdom or the United States. Significant pain reductions were also observed during short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up.
conclusionOMT significantly reduces low back pain. The level of pain reduction is greater than expected from placebo effects alone and persists for at least three months. Additional research is warranted to elucidate mechanistically how OMT exerts its effects, to determine if OMT benefits are long lasting, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of OMT as a complementary treatment for low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.