Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16080794›Full record

SynthesisBMC musculoskeletal disorders2005

Osteopathic manipulative treatment for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

John C Licciardone, Angela K Brimhall, Linda N King

6 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 6 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00315120 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment and Ultrasound Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of North Texas Health Science CenterRan2006 to 2011Enrolled455ConditionsLow Back PainArmsA. Active OMT and active UST, B. Sham OMT and active UST, C. Active OMT and sham UST, D. Sham OMT and sham UST
NCT00410397 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

The Use of Myofascial Release in Lumbopelvic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorOklahoma State University Center for Health SciencesRan2006 to 2007Enrolled27ConditionsLow Back Pain, PainArmsOsteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Sham Manipulation
NCT01258543 completednot on this mapstarted 2010, after this paper: background citation

Osteopathic Evaluation on Patients With Non-specific Back Pain: An Observational Inter-examiner Reliability Study

TypeobservationalSponsorKirnan, JaimeRan2010 to 2011Enrolled20ConditionsInter-examiner Reliability, Location and Nature of Restriction or Lesion, Non-specific Back PainArmsGeneral Osteopathic Evaluation
NCT02034864 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2 Manual Therapies on Functional Outcome in Sub-acute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain at 3 Months : a Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisRan2014 to 2017Enrolled400ConditionsSubacute and Chronic Non-specific Low Back PainArmsOsteopathic manipulative treatment, Placebo of osteopathic manipulative treatment
NCT02111382 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Electroencephalography Activity in Individuals With Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain After Cranial Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BrasiliaRan2018 to 2018Enrolled0ConditionsLow Back PainArmsCV4 Cranial (4th ventricle technique) Osteopathic Manipulative, CV4 (4th ventricle technique) manual therapy sham technique
NCT04673058 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Spinal Manipulation in Addition to Standard Pharmacological Treatment in Fibromyalgia : A Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBezmialem Vakif UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled60ConditionsFibromyalgiaArmsSpinal Manipulation, Sham Manipulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 289 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Muscle energy technique for non-specific low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Spinal manipulative therapy for chronic low-back pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. A systematic review on the effectiveness of complementary and alternative medicine for chronic non-specific low-back pain.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2010
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

John C LicciardoneOsteopathic Research Center, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX 76107, USA. jlicciar@hsc.unt.edu
Angela K Brimhall
Linda N King
University of North Texas · USUniversity of North Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

PHS HHS D56HP00170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) is a distinctive modality commonly used by osteopathic physicians to complement their conventional treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. Previous reviews and meta-analyses of spinal manipulation for low back pain have not specifically addressed OMT and generally have focused on spinal manipulation as an alternative to conventional treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of OMT as a complementary treatment for low back pain.

methodsComputerized bibliographic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, MANTIS, OSTMED, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were supplemented with additional database and manual searches of the literature. Six trials, involving eight OMT vs control treatment comparisons, were included because they were randomized controlled trials of OMT that involved blinded assessment of low back pain in ambulatory settings. Data on trial methodology, OMT and control treatments, and low back pain outcomes were abstracted by two independent reviewers. Effect sizes were computed using Cohen's d statistic and meta-analysis results were weighted by the inverse variance of individual comparisons. In addition to the overall meta-analysis, stratified meta-analyses were performed according to control treatment, country where the trial was conducted, and duration of follow-up. Sensitivity analyses were performed for both the overall and stratified meta-analyses.

resultsOverall, OMT significantly reduced low back pain (effect size, -0.30; 95% confidence interval, -0.47 - -0.13; P = .001). Stratified analyses demonstrated significant pain reductions in trials of OMT vs active treatment or placebo control and OMT vs no treatment control. There were significant pain reductions with OMT regardless of whether trials were performed in the United Kingdom or the United States. Significant pain reductions were also observed during short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-up.

conclusionOMT significantly reduces low back pain. The level of pain reduction is greater than expected from placebo effects alone and persists for at least three months. Additional research is warranted to elucidate mechanistically how OMT exerts its effects, to determine if OMT benefits are long lasting, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of OMT as a complementary treatment for low back pain.

Indexed as

Manipulation, OsteopathicHumansLow Back PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID16080794
PMCPMC1208896
OpenAlexW1862326094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.