Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16078556›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique

Literacy and health research in Canada: where have we been and where should we go?

Irving Rootman, Barbara Ronson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Readability of the American, Canadian, and British Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Societies' Patient Materials.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Malaysian Health Literacy: Scorecard Performance from a National Survey.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  15. The Quality, Readability, Completeness, and Accuracy of PTSD Websites for Firefighters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Men's health literacy: a review and recommendations.Health promotion international · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health Literacy Studies Conducted in Australia: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irving RootmanFaculty of Human and Social Development, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC. irootman@uvic.ca
Barbara Ronson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews current literature and research on literacy and health and identifies priorities for research on this topic in Canada. Information sources included documents found through an environmental scan, the Alpha Plus collection and a computer search of recent documents. The information was analyzed using a conceptual framework. The review found that low literacy has direct and indirect impacts on health. Families are at risk due to difficulty reading medication prescriptions, baby formula instructions and health and safety education materials. People with lower levels of literacy tend to live and work in less healthy environments. They have more difficulties obtaining employment and income security. Determinants of literacy include: education, early childhood development, aging, living and working conditions, personal capacity/genetics, gender and culture. Action is needed to improve literacy and health through a combination of health communication, education and training, community development, organizational development, and policy development. There is some evidence that such interventions can have a positive effect on health, particularly when combined with one another. Further program and policy development requires greater evidence and evaluation of existing initiatives, more cost/benefit analyses, more culturally specific studies, and greater attention to current social trends and needs.

Indexed as

CommunicationEducational StatusAdolescentCanadaFemaleHealth PrioritiesHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedResearch

Identifiers

PMID16078556
PMCPMC6975604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.