Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16078147›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical research2005

Effect of salt type on hygroscopicity of a new cephalosporin S-3578.

Kohsaku Kawakami, Yasuo Ida, Tohru Yamaguchi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kohsaku KawakamiDevelopmental Research Laboratories, Shionogi & Co., Ltd., 12-4 Sagisu 5-chome, Fukushima-ku, Osaka, 553-0002, Japan. kohsaku_kawakami@merck.com
Yasuo Ida
Tohru Yamaguchi
Shionogi (Japan) · JPFutaba (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEffect of salt type on hygroscopicity was evaluated using S-3578 salts.

methodsThe hydration behavior of a sulfate and a nitrate salt of S-3578 were evaluated by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), simultaneous measurement of PXRD-differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), moisture sorption analysis, simultaneous measurement of thermogravimetric/differential thermal analyses, and solid state 13C-nuclear magnetic resonance (C-NMR).

resultsThe sulfate salt incorporated two types of lattice water to form a monohydrate or a trihydrate. Additional water could also be absorbed as channel water to expand the lattice structure. The activation energy for dehydration was very high, probably due to steric hindrance in the lattice structure. The nitrate salt incorporated only one water molecule per compound as the lattice water. The additional water was absorbed as channel water as observed for the sulfate salt. X-ray diffractograms showed little dependence on the salt type under the ambient condition. The hydration number was likely to be affected by the size of the counter acids.

conclusionsThe hygroscopicity of S-3578 salts was significantly altered by the salt type. The difference in the amount of the lattice water could be explained in terms of the difference in the molecular size of the counter acids.

Indexed as

AbsorptionAlgorithmsCalorimetry, Differential ScanningCephalosporinsChemical PhenomenaChemistry, PhysicalMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopySodium ChlorideThermogravimetryWaterX-Ray Diffraction7-(2-(5-amino-1,2,4-thiadiazol-3-yl)-2-ethoxyiminoacetamido)-3-(1-(3-methylaminopropyl)-1H-imidazo(4,5-b)pyridinium-4-yl)methyl-3-cephem-4-carboxylateCephalosporinsSodium ChlorideWater

Identifiers

PMID16078147
OpenAlexW2016546778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.