ArticleDevelopment genes and evolution2005
The micro1 gene is necessary and sufficient for micromere differentiation and mid/hindgut-inducing activity in the sea urchin embryo.
Article in Development genes and evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- From genome to anatomy: The architecture and evolution of the skeletogenic gene regulatory network of sea urchins and other echinoderms.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2018Review
- Global analysis of primary mesenchyme cell cis-regulatory modules by chromatin accessibility profiling.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Diversification of spatiotemporal expression and copy number variation of the echinoid hbox12/pmar1/micro1 multigene family.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- The Maternal Maverick/GDF15-like TGF-β Ligand Panda Directs Dorsal-Ventral Axis Formation by Restricting Nodal Expression in the Sea Urchin Embryo.PLoS biology · 2015Article
- Early asymmetric cues triggering the dorsal/ventral gene regulatory network of the sea urchin embryo.eLife · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the sea urchin embryo, micromeres have two distinct functions: they differentiate cell autonomously into the skeletogenic mesenchyme cells and act as an organizing center that induces endomesoderm formation. We demonstrated that micro1 controls micromere specification as a transcriptional repressor. Because micro1 is a multicopy gene with at least six polymorphic loci, it has been difficult to consistently block micro1 function by morpholino-mediated knockdown. Here, to block micro1 function, we used an active activator of micro1 consisting of a fusion protein of the VP16 activation domain and the micro1 homeodomain. Embryos injected with mRNA encoding the fusion protein exhibited a phenotype similar to that of micromere-less embryos. To evaluate micro1 function in the micromere, we constructed chimeric embryos composed of animal cap mesomeres and a micromere quartet from embryos injected with the fusion protein mRNA. The chimeras developed into dauerblastulae with no vegetal structures, in which the micromere progeny constituted the blastula wall. We also analyzed the phenotype of chimeras composed of an animal cap and a mesomere expressing micro1. These chimeras developed into pluteus larvae, in which the mesomere descendants ingressed as primary mesenchyme cells and formed a complete set of skeletal rods. The hindgut and a part of the midgut were also generated from host mesomeres. However, the foregut and nonskeletogenic mesoderm were not formed in the larvae. From these observations, we conclude that micro1 is necessary and sufficient for both micromere differentiation and mid/hindgut-inducing activity, and we also suggest that micro1 may not fulfill all micromere functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.