Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16077013›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

Discovery, validation, and genetic dissection of transcription factor binding sites by comparative and functional genomics.

Jason Gertz, Linda Riles, Peter Turnbaugh, Su-Wen Ho, Barak A Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Adaptive Response ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  2. A Biological Inventory of Prophages inFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Linking DNA-binding proteins to their recognition sequences by using protein microarrays.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2006
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jason GertzDepartment of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63108, USA.
Linda Riles
Peter Turnbaugh
Su-Wen Ho
Barak A Cohen
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Completing the annotation of a genome sequence requires identifying the regulatory sequences that control gene expression. To identify these sequences, we developed an algorithm that searches for short, conserved sequence motifs in the genomes of related species. The method is effective in finding motifs de novo and for refining known regulatory motifs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We tested one novel motif prediction of the algorithm and found it to be the binding site of Stp2; it is significantly different from the previously predicted Stp2 binding site. We show that Stp2 physically interacts with this sequence motif, and that stp2 mutations affect the expression of genes associated with the motif. We demonstrate that the Stp2 binding site also interacts genetically with Stp1, a regulator of amino acid permease genes and, with Sfp1, a key regulator of cell growth. These results illuminate an important transcriptional circuit that regulates cell growth through external nutrient uptake.

Indexed as

ArylsulfotransferaseBase SequenceBinding SitesConserved SequenceGene Expression RegulationGenomicsMolecular Sequence DataMutationPromoter Regions, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsTranscription FactorsArylsulfotransferaseSULT1A1 protein, humanSULT1A2 protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16077013
PMCPMC1182227
OpenAlexW2158561153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.