ArticleJournal of medical ethics2005
The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survey on the current practice of research ethics committees in the Czech academic environment: a mixed-methods study.BMC medical ethics · 2024Article
- Towards a culture of care for ethical review: connections and frictions in institutional and individual practices of social research ethics.Social & cultural geography · 2023Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2019Article
- The role of research ethics committees in making decisions about risk.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2014Article
- In the lion's den? Experiences of interaction with research ethics committees.Journal of medical ethics · 2012Article
- Empirical assessments of clinical ethics services: implications for clinical ethics committees.Clinical ethics · 2007Article
- An eight-year follow-up national study of medical school and general hospital ethics committees in Japan.BMC medical ethics · 2007Article
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity.Journal of medical ethics · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On 1 May 2004 research ethics committees became legally accountable to a new government body, the United Kingdom Ethics Committee Authority. This marks the end of the self regulation of research ethics. This paper describes how this change in research ethics committee status has come about and explores the implications for research subjects, researchers, institutions, and for regulation of research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.