Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16075285›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2005

Antinociceptive effects of haloperidol and its metabolites in the formalin test in mice.

Cruz M Cendán, José M Pujalte, Enrique Portillo-Salido, José M Baeyens

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Structures of the σNature · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sigma-1 receptors control immune-driven peripheral opioid analgesia during inflammation in mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The antagonistic effect of the sigma 1 receptor ligand (+)-MR200 on persistent pain induced by inflammation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cruz M CendánDepartment of Pharmacology and Institute of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Avenida de Madrid 12, 18012, Granada, Spain.
José M Pujalte
Enrique Portillo-Salido
José M Baeyens
Universidad de Granada · ESEsteve Química (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleFormalin-induced pain is reduced in sigma-1 (sigma1) receptor knockout mice; therefore, we hypothesized that haloperidol and its metabolites I and II, which have affinity for sigma1 receptors, may modulate formalin-induced pain.

resultsIntraplantar administration of formalin (2.5%) to CD-1 mice produced a biphasic period of pain. Haloperidol (0.03-1 mg/kg, s.c.) and reduced haloperidol (metabolite II, 0.25-8 mg/kg, s.c.) dose-dependently inhibited both phases of formalin-induced pain. Haloperidol metabolite I (4-128 mg/kg, s.c.) also produced dose-dependent antinociception in the second phase of the formalin test, but was less potent and effective against first-phase pain. Haloperidol metabolite III (16 and 128 mg/kg) and (-)sulpiride (200 mg/kg), which have no affinity for sigma1 receptors, did not produce significant antinociception in either phase of the formalin test. The order of potency of the drugs to produce their antinociceptive effect [haloperidol>metabolite II>metabolite I>>metabolite III= (-)sulpiride=inactive] correlated with their affinity for sigma1 receptors, but not with their affinity for sigma2 or dopamine D2 receptors. Naloxone (1 mg/kg, s.c.) did not antagonize the antinociception induced by haloperidol and its metabolites. None of the antinociceptive drugs in the formalin test produced any antinociception in the tail flick test.

conclusionThese results suggest that the antinociceptive effect of haloperidol and its metabolites in the formalin test is not due to unspecific/generalised inhibition of nociception or modulation of opioid receptors, and that it may be related, at least partially, to the ability of these drugs to interact with sigma1 receptors.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsFemaleFormaldehydeHaloperidolMiceMorphineNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcoticsPainPain MeasurementAnalgesicsFormaldehydeHaloperidolMorphineNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID16075285
OpenAlexW1996167692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.