ArticleCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2006
Nitroreductase-based therapy of prostate cancer, enhanced by raising expression of heat shock protein 70, acts through increased anti-tumour immunity.
Article in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring paraptosis as a therapeutic approach in cancer treatment.Journal of biomedical science · 2024Review
- Adenovirus-mediated REIC/Dkk-3 gene therapy: Development of an autologous cancer vaccination therapy (Review).Oncology letters · 2014Article
- Molecular markers in prostate cancer. Part II: potential roles in management.Asian journal of andrology · 2009Review
- Molecular mechanisms of paraptosis induction: implications for a non-genetically modified tumor vaccine.PloS one · 2009Article
- Combining gene and immunotherapy for prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2008Article
- Advances in preclinical investigation of prostate cancer gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy (GDEPT) using nitroreductase (NTR), with efficient adenoviral delivery, and CB1954 (CB), is an effective means of directly killing tumours. However, an immune-mediated bystander effect remains an important product of GDEPT since it is often critical to the elimination of untransduced tumour cells both locally and at distal metastatic sites through generation of tumour-specific immunity without the need for tumour antigen identification or the generation of a personalised vaccine. The mode of induced tumour cell death is thought to contribute to the immunisation process, together with the induction and release of stress proteins. Here, RM-9 murine prostate tumour cells were efficiently killed by adenovirally delivered NTR/CB treatment both in vitro and in vivo, and bystander effects were observed. Cells appeared to die by pathways that suggest necrosis more than that of classical apoptosis. NTR/CB-induced expression of a range of stress proteins was determined by proteomic analysis, revealing chiefly heat shock protein (HSP)25 and HSP70 upregulation, whilst immune responses in vivo were weak. In an attempt to enhance the anti-tumour effect, an adenoviral vector was constructed that co-expressed NTR and HSP70, the latter being a known immune stimulator and chaperone of antigen. This combination elicited significantly enhanced protection over NTR alone for both the treated tumour and a subsequent re-challenge. Protection was CD4+ and CD8+ T cell-dependent and was associated with tumour-specific CTL, IFNgamma and IL-5 responses. The use of such a cytotoxic and immunomodulatory gene combination in cancer therapy warrants further pursuit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.