Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16075186›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996)2006

Linkage analyses of chromosomal region 18p11-q12 in dyslexia.

J Schumacher, I R König, E Plume, P Propping, A Warnke, M Manthey, M Duell, A Kleensang, D Repsilber, M Preis and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetics of developmental dyslexia.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2010
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Developmental dyslexia: an update.Journal of human genetics · 2007
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

J SchumacherInstitut für Humangenetik, Lübeck, Germany.
I R König
E Plume
P Propping
A Warnke
M Manthey
M Duell
A Kleensang
D Repsilber
M Preis
H Remschmidt
A Ziegler
M M Nöthen
G Schulte-Körne

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dyslexia is characterized as a significant impairment in reading and spelling ability that cannot be explained by low intelligence, low school attendance or deficits in sensory acuity. It is known to be a hereditary disorder that affects about 5% of school aged children, making it the most common of childhood learning disorders. Several susceptibility loci have been reported on chromosomes 1, 2, 3, 6, 15, and 18. The locus on chromosome 18 has been described as having the strongest influence on single word reading, phoneme awareness, and orthographic coding in the largest genome wide linkage study published to date (Fisher et al., 2002). Here we present data from 82 German families in order to investigate linkage of various dyslexia-related traits to the previously described region on chromosome 18p11-q12. Using two- and multipoint analyses, we did not find support for linkage of spelling, single word reading, phoneme awareness, orthographic coding and rapid naming to any of the 14 genotyped STR markers. Possible explanations for our non-replication include differences in study design, limited power of our study and overestimation of the effect of the chromosome 18 locus in the original study.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrainChildChromosome MappingChromosomes, Human, Pair 18DNA Mutational AnalysisDyslexiaFemaleGenetic LinkageGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMaleMutationGenetic Markers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.