Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16075051›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2005

You are right too!

Joseph L Witztum

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. CD36, a scavenger receptor implicated in atherosclerosis.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2014
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph L WitztumDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA. jwitztum@ucsd.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophage scavenger receptors, such as CD36 and class A scavenger receptor (SR-A), have previously been thought to play a central role in foam cell formation and atherogenesis by mediating the uptake of oxidized LDL. In this issue of the JCI, Moore et al. report that Apoe mice deficient in either CD36 or SR-A did not have less atherosclerosis at the level of the aortic valve than did wild-type Apoe mice. In contrast, similar studies by previous investigators found that deletion of these receptors decreased atherogenesis. The reasons for the different results are not known, but these data suggest that the role of these receptors in atherogenesis remains unresolved.

Indexed as

AnimalsAortic ValveApolipoproteins EArteriosclerosisCD36 AntigensFoam CellsGene DeletionHumansLipoproteins, LDLMiceMice, KnockoutReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ScavengerScavenger Receptors, Class AApolipoproteins ECD36 AntigensLipoproteins, LDLoxidized low density lipoproteinReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ScavengerScavenger Receptors, Class A

Identifiers

PMID16075051
PMCPMC1180570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.