ReviewJournal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA2005
Complementary competencies: public health and health sciences librarianship.
Review in Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Empowerment: A Partnership for Community Engagement in ThreePhases.Journal of consumer health on the Internet · 2022Article
- A pilot project to increase health literacy among youth from seasonal farmworker families in rural eastern North Carolina: a qualitative exploration of implementation and impact.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2019Article
- Developing an evidence-based public health informatics course.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2015Article
- Integrating information literacy into the education of public health professionals: roles for librarians and the library.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2008Article
- We are all public health.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2007Article
- The National Network of Libraries of Medicine's outreach to the public health workforce: 2001-2006.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2007Article
- Health Libraries and Information Services in Tanzania: A Strategic Assessment.Annals of global healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe authors sought to identify opportunities for partnership between the communities of public health workers and health sciences librarians.
methodsThe authors review competencies in public health and health sciences librarianship. They highlight previously identified public health informatics competencies and the Medical Library Association's essential areas of knowledge. Based on points of correspondence between the two domains, the authors identify specific opportunities for partnership.
resultsThe points of correspondence between public health and health sciences librarianship are reflected in several past projects involving both communities. These previous collaborations and the services provided by health sciences librarians at many public health organizations suggest that some health sciences librarians may be considered full members of the public health workforce. Opportunities remain for productive collaboration between public health workers and health sciences librarians.
conclusionsDrawing on historical and contemporary experience, this paper presents an initial framework for forming collaborations between health sciences librarians and members of the public health workforce. This framework may stimulate thinking about how to form additional partnerships between members of these two communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16059423PMC1175799What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.