ArticleArchives of toxicology1992
Altered lung function in rats after subacute exposure to n-butyl isocyanate.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ocular irritation from product of pesticide degradation among workers in a seed warehouse.Industrial health · 2015Article
- Respiratory and other hazards of isocyanates.International archives of occupational and environmental health · 1994Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to use pulmonary function tests, blood gas measurements and bronchoalveolar lung lavage (BAL) to characterize lesions in the respiratory tract of young adult male Wistar rats as a result of a 5-day exposure (6 h/day) to 0, 1.1, 6.2, 15 or 26 mg n-butyl isocyanate (n-BIC)/m3 air. Further objectives were to probe the diagnostic sensitivities of these procedures in comparison with more traditional evaluations (clinical observation, lung weight, histopathology). Measurements were performed during post-exposure weeks 2 and 5. Most rats exposed to 26 mg/m3 died or were sacrificed in a moribund state during post-exposure week 2. All other rats survived the exposure regimen. In rats exposed to 15 and 26 mg/m3 a significant decrease in body weight, laboured breathing, hypoactivity, nasal discharge, cyanosis, and hypothermia were observed. Pulmonary function measurements revealed increased total lung capacity (TLC) and residual volume (RV), decreased forced expiratory flow rates and quasi-static compliance in rats exposed to 26 mg/m3. At the end of the observation period rats exposed to 6.2 and 15 mg/m3 air were hyperresponsive to an acetylcholine bronchoprovocation aerosol. Arterial blood gas measurements revealed an arterial hypoxia and an increase in venous admixture, suggesting a severe mismatch of the ventilation-perfusion relationship. Biochemical and cellular components in BAL fluid (BALF) indicated a concentration dependent and protracted increase of polymorphonuclear leucocytes and further inflammatory parameters. In the 1.1 mg/m3 group BALF parameters were not significantly elevated. The major histopathological lesions of the lung were thickening of septa, emphysema, and intra-alveolar oedema in rats exposed to 26 mg/m3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.