Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16055553›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Adult mice cloned from migrating primordial germ cells.

Yukiko Yamazaki, Eleanor W Low, Yusuke Marikawa, Kazuhiro Iwahashi, Marisa S Bartolomei, John R McCarrey, Ryuzo Yanagimachi

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Epigenetic programming and reprogramming during development.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yukiko YamazakiInstitute for Biogenesis Research, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. yyamazak@hawaii.edu
Eleanor W Low
Yusuke Marikawa
Kazuhiro Iwahashi
Marisa S Bartolomei
John R McCarrey
Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · USUniversity of Hawaii System · US

Funding

Germline-specific reprogramming in cloned miceR01HD042772 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO · PI MCCARREY, JOHN R · 2002 to 2006
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD042772NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We previously reported that the genomes of gonadal germ cells at 11.5-19.5 days postcoitum (dpc) are incompetent to support full-term development of cloned mouse embryos. In this study, we performed nuclear transfer using primordial germ cells (PGCs) from earlier stages at 8.5-10.5 dpc. When PGC nuclei at 8.5, 9.5, and 10.5 dpc were transferred into enucleated oocytes, seven cloned embryos developed into full-term offspring. Of these, five, all derived from 8.5- or 9.5-dpc PGCs, developed into healthy adults with normal fertility. Of the remaining two offspring derived from 10.5-dpc PGCs, one died shortly after birth, and the other showed slight growth retardation but subsequently developed into a fertile adult. We examined allele-specific methylation at the imprinted H19 and Snrpn loci in 9.5- to 11.5-dpc PGCs. Although the beginning of methylation erasure was evident on the H19 paternal allele at 9.5 dpc, most PGCs did not demonstrate significant erasure of paternal allele-specific methylation until 10.5 dpc. Maternal allele-specific methylation was largely erased from Snrpn by 10.5 dpc. By 11.5 dpc, the majority of PGCs showed nearly complete or complete erasure of allele-specific methylation in both H19 and Snrpn. These results demonstrate that at least some genomic imprints remain largely intact in 8.5- to 9.5-dpc PGCs and then undergo erasure at approximately 10.5 dpc as the PGCs enter the genital ridges. Thus, migrating PGCs at 8.5-9.5 dpc can be successfully used as donors for nuclear transfer, whereas gonadal PGCs at 11.5 dpc and later are incompetent to support full-term development.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationNuclear Transfer TechniquesAge FactorsAlkaline PhosphataseAnimalsAutoantigensCloning, OrganismDNA PrimersEmbryo TransferGenomic ImprintingGerm CellsMiceMice, TransgenicRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedAlkaline PhosphataseAutoantigensDNA PrimersH19 long non-coding RNAhydrogen sulfiteRibonucleoproteins, Small NuclearRNA, Long NoncodingRNA, UntranslatedsnRNP Core ProteinsSulfites

Identifiers

PMID16055553
PMCPMC1182132
OpenAlexW1997922216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.