Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16055057›Full record

ReviewNeuron2005

Mitochondria and neurotransmission: evacuating the synapse.

Peter J Hollenbeck

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuron, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mitochondrial CaBiomolecules · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Genetic mutations in kinases: a comprehensive review on marketed inhibitors and unexplored targets in Parkinson's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Differential CaFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mitochondrial calcium cycling in neuronal function and neurodegeneration.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. The new role of FExperimental neurology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter J HollenbeckDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA. phollenb@purdue.edu

Funding

CONTROL OF NEURONAL ORGANELLE TRANSPORTR01NS027073 · NINDS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI HOLLENBECK, PETER J. · 1990 to 2013
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS027073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An abundance of mitochondria has been the hallmark of synapses since their first ultrastructural description 50 years ago. Mitochondria have been shown to be essential for synaptic form and function in many systems, but until recently it has not been clear exactly what role(s) they play in neurotransmission. Now, evidence from the nervous system of Drosophila identifies the specific subcellular events that are most dependent upon nearby mitochondria.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMitochondriaSynapsesSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID16055057
PMCPMC2538582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.