Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16052352›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2006

The molecular basis of neutral aminoacidurias.

Angelika Bröer, Juleen A Cavanaugh, John E J Rasko, Stefan Bröer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Heteromeric Solute Carriers: Function, Structure, Pathology and Pharmacology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Review
  4. Amino acid transporter B(0)AT1 (slc6a19) and ancillary protein: impact on function.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2016
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mental retardation and inborn errors of metabolism.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2009
    Review
  10. Characterisation of electrogenic nutrient absorption in the Cftr TgH(neoim)Hgu mouse model.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angelika BröerSchool of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Australian National University, Canberra.
Juleen A Cavanaugh
John E J Rasko
Stefan Bröer
Australian National University · AUCanberra Hospital · AUCentenary Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent success in the molecular cloning and identification of apical neutral amino acid transporters has shed a new light on inherited neutral amino acidurias, such as Hartnup disorder and Iminoglycinuria. Hartnup disorder is caused by mutations in the neutral amino acid transporter B(0) AT1 (SLC6A19). The transporter is found in kidney and intestine, where it is involved in the resorption of all neutral amino acids. The molecular defect underlying Iminoglycinuria has not yet been identified. However, two transporters, the proton amino acid transporter PAT1 (SLC36A1) and the IMINO transporter (SLC6A20) appear to play key roles in the resorption of glycine and proline. A model is presented, involving all three transporters that can explain the phenotypic variability of iminoglycinuria.

Indexed as

Amino Acids, NeutralAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralHumansIntestinal MucosaKidneyRenal AminoaciduriasAmino Acids, NeutralAmino Acid Transport Systems, Neutral

Identifiers

PMID16052352
OpenAlexW1979927918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.