Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16052327›Full record

ArticleDiabetologia2005

Body mass index has a greater impact on pregnancy outcomes than gestational hyperglycaemia.

W Ricart, J López, J Mozas, A Pericot, M A Sancho, N González, M Balsells, R Luna, A Cortázar, P Navarro and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetologia, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes of twin pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes: a meta-analysis of observational studies.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 1 country.

W RicartUnit of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Nutrition, University Hospital Doctor Josep Trueta, Avgda. de frança s.n., 17007, Girona, Spain. uden.wricart@htrueta.scs.es
J López
J Mozas
A Pericot
M A Sancho
N González
M Balsells
R Luna
A Cortázar
P Navarro
O Ramírez
B Flández
L F Pallardo
A Hernández-Mijas
J Ampudia
J M Fernández-Real
R Corcoy
Spanish Group for the Study of the Impact of Carpenter and Coustan GDM Thresholds
Hospital Universitari de Girona Doctor Josep Trueta · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa · ESHospital de Cruces · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis · ESHospital Universitario de Canarias · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario Doctor Peset · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESHospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESHospital Xeral Calde · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims/hypothesisWe evaluated diabetes-related pregnancy outcomes in a cohort of Spanish women in relation to their glucose tolerance status, prepregnancy BMI and other predictive variables.

methodsThe present paper is part of a prospective study to evaluate the impact of American Diabetes Association (2000) criteria in the Spanish population. A total of 9,270 pregnant women were studied and categorised as follows according to prepregnancy BMI quartiles and glucose tolerance status: (1) negative screenees; (2) false-positive screenees; (3) gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to American Diabetes Association criteria only; and (4) GDM according to National Diabetes Data Group criteria (NDDG). We evaluated fetal macrosomia, Caesarean section and seven secondary outcomes as diabetes-related pregnancy outcomes. The population-attributable and population-prevented fractions of predictor variables were calculated after binary logistic regression analysis with multiple predictors.

resultsBoth prepregnancy BMI and abnormal glucose tolerance categories were independent predictors of pregnancy outcomes. The upper quartile of BMI accounted for 23% of macrosomia, 9.4% of Caesarean section, 50% of pregnancy-induced hypertension and 17.6% of large-for-gestational-age newborns. In contrast, NDDG GDM accounted for 3.8% of macrosomia, 9.1% of pregnancy-induced hypertension and 3.4% of preterm births. CONCLUSIONS/

interpretationIn terms of population impact, prepregnancy maternal BMI exhibits a much stronger influence than abnormal blood glucose tolerance on macrosomia, Caesarean section, pregnancy-induced hypertension and large-for-gestational-age newborns.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexPregnancy OutcomeAdultBlood GlucoseCesarean SectionFemaleFetal MacrosomiaGlucose Tolerance TestHumansHyperglycemiaInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal AgePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSpainBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID16052327
OpenAlexW2002506288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.