ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2005
Enoxaparin in clinical practice and clinical trials of non-ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS).
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-ST elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is a myocardial ischemic disorder frequently caused by coronary artery plaque rupture and partial or transient vessel occlusion. Platelets and thrombin play pivotal roles in formation and propagation of thrombus at the site of plaque disruption and embolization into the vascular bed. With the outgoing development of antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and mechanical therapies, the management of NSTE-ACS is constantly evolving. Heparins are the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy in the current management of NSTE-ACS. Unfractionated heparin and fractionated heparins like enoxaparin have been studied in several large clinical trials and found to be effective in reducing death and myocardial infarction rates. For medical management alone or primarily (conservative strategy), enoxaparin has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin. With an early invasive strategy providing better clinical outcome compared to a conservative strategy, the paradigm of ACS management has shifted in favor of early (within 48 hours of admission) cardiac catheterization. The effectiveness of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin is now being re-considered in the era of poly-pharmacotherapy and an early invasive strategy for ACS management. We review the role of enoxaparin in the contemporary treatment of NSTE-ACS utilizing recent clinical trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.