Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16052202›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2005

Empowering primary care to tackle the obesity epidemic: the Counterweight Programme.

M McQuigg, J Brown, J Broom, R A Laws, J P D Reckless, P A Noble, S Kumar, E L McCombie, M E J Lean, G F Lyons and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Feasibility and indicative results from a 12-month low-energy liquid diet treatment and maintenance programme for severe obesity.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Evaluation of the Counterweight Programme for obesity management in primary care: a starting point for continuous improvement.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  19. Obesity in primary care: evidence for advising weight constancy rather than weight loss in unsuccessful dieters.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2008
    Article
  20. ABC of obesity. Obesity--time to wake up.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M McQuiggDiabetes Centre, Royal United Hospital, Bath, UK.
J Brown
J Broom
R A Laws
J P D Reckless
P A Noble
S Kumar
E L McCombie
M E J Lean
G F Lyons
G S Frost
M F Quinn
J H Barth
S M Haynes
N Finer
H M Ross
D J Hole
Counterweight Project Team
Royal United Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo improve the management of obese adults (18-75 y) in primary care.

designCohort study. SETTINGS: UK primary care. SUBJECTS: Obese patients (body mass index > or =30 kg/m(2)) or BMI> or =28 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidities in 80 general practices.

interventionThe model consists of four phases: (1) audit and project development, (2) practice training and support, (3) nurse-led patient intervention, and (4) evaluation. The intervention programme used evidence-based pathways, which included strategies to empower clinicians and patients. Weight Management Advisers who are specialist obesity dietitians facilitated programme implementation.

main outcome measuresProportion of practices trained and recruiting patients, and weight change at 12 months.

resultsBy March 2004, 58 of the 62 (93.5%) intervention practices had been trained, 47 (75.8%) practices were active in implementing the model and 1549 patients had been recruited. At 12 months, 33% of patients achieved a clinically meaningful weight loss of 5% or more. A total of 49% of patients were classed as 'completers' in that they attended the requisite number of appointments in 3, 6 and 12 months. 'Completers' achieved more successful weight loss with 40% achieving a weight loss of 5% or more at 12 months.

conclusionThe Counterweight programme provides a promising model to improve the management of obesity in primary care.

Indexed as

Outcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesEvidence-Based MedicineExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedNutritional Sciences

Identifiers

PMID16052202
OpenAlexW2167195412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.