Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16051934›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2005

Obesity in US workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 1986 to 2002.

Alberto J Caban, David J Lee, Lora E Fleming, Orlando Gómez-Marín, William LeBlanc, Terry Pitman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alberto J CabanDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
David J Lee
Lora E Fleming
Orlando Gómez-Marín
William LeBlanc
Terry Pitman

Funding

NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH003915
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesObesity has emerged as one of the most important public health issues in the United States. We assessed obesity prevalence rates and their trends among major US occupational groups.

methodsSelf-reported weight and height were collected annually on US workers, aged 18 years or older, from the 1986 to 1995 and the 1997 to 2002 National Health Interview Surveys. Overall, occupation-, race-, and gender-specific rates of obesity (defined as a body mass index>30.0 kg/m2) were calculated with data pooled from both study periods (n>600,000). Annual occupation-specific prevalence rates were also calculated, and their time trends were assessed.

resultsObesity rates increased significantly over time among employed workers, irrespective of race and gender. The average yearly change increased from 0.61% (+/-.04) during the period from 1986 to 1995 to 0.95% (+/-.11) during the period from 1997 to 2002. Average obesity prevalence rates and corresponding trends varied considerably across occupational groups; pooled obesity prevalence rates were highest in motor vehicle operators (31.7% in men; 31.0% in women).

conclusionsWeight loss intervention programs targeting workers employed in occupational groups with high or increasing rates of obesity are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Health SurveysAdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNational Center for Health Statistics, U.S.ObesityOccupational HealthOccupationsPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID16051934
PMCPMC1449406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.