Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16049526›Full record

ReviewOncogene2005

Aurora kinases: shining lights on the therapeutic horizon?

Paul D Andrews

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. BRD4 regulates Aurora B kinase activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Structure of Aurora B-INCENP in complex with barasertib reveals a potential transinhibitory mechanism.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul D AndrewsDivision of Gene Regulation and Expression, Wellcome Trust Biocentre, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 5EH, UK. p.d.andrews@dundee.ac.uk
Wellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Aurora kinases have been implicated in tumorigenesis and are important regulators of diverse cell cycle events, ranging from the entry into mitosis, centrosome function, mitotic spindle formation, chromosome biorientation and segregation, and cytokinesis. The recent identification of novel binding partners and key downstream effectors, together with new small-molecule inhibitors that display efficacy against tumours, heralds an upsurge of interest in these critical kinases. This review details new developments in the field and analyses the potential of Aurora kinases as anticancer targets.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAurora KinasesCell CycleCentrosomeChromosomesHumansMitosisNeoplasmsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAntineoplastic AgentsAurora KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID16049526
OpenAlexW1982209220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.