ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2005
Coronary artery stents: identification and evaluation.
Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- How plaque morphology and stenosis severity govern stent-artery interaction and deployment outcomes: a computational study.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026Article
- Manufacturing, Processing, and Characterization of Self-Expanding Metallic Stents: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- 3D-printed, citrate-based bioresorbable vascular scaffolds for coronary artery angioplasty.Bioactive materials · 2024Article
- Clopidogrel-loaded vascular grafts prepared using digital light processing 3D printing.Drug delivery and translational research · 2024Article
- 3D-Printed Piezoelectric Stents for Electricity Generation Driven by Pressure Fluctuation.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2024Article
- Cardiac interventions on total knee arthroplasty: a national inpatient sample-based analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- First-in-Human Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Stent Positioning Assistance System for Precise Positioning of Coronary Stents.Journal of interventional cardiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Tissue-engineered blood vessel mimics in complex geometries for intravascular device testing.PloS one · 2019Article
- A Review of the Ultrathin Orsiro Biodegradable Polymer Drug-eluting Stent in the Treatment of Coronary Artery Disease.Heart international · 2019Review
- Coronary Stents: History, Design, and Construction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2018Review
- Management of embedded metallic stents used in the treatment of grades III and IV subglottic, and upper tracheal stenosis in adults.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2014Article
- Quantitative biocompatibility evaluation of nickel-free high-nitrogen stainless steel in vitro/in vivo.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2014Article
- Revolutionizing Cardiovascular Frontiers: A Dive Into Cutting-Edge Innovations in Coronary Stent Technology.Cardiology in reviewReview
- Photoacoustic imaging of clinical metal needles in tissue.Journal of biomedical opticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
First introduced in the 1980s, the coronary stent has been used to reduce the rate of arterial restenosis. Coronary stent implantation is currently a common procedure performed by interventional cardiologists, and the market for development and design is constantly expanding and evolving. This article was designed to assist pathologists in the accurate identification of coronary stents that are currently available, in addition to some that are no longer being implanted. The stents reviewed here were chosen based on frequency of use and/or occurrence in the literature. Some of the newer models have yet to undergo extensive clinical testing. The summaries accompanying each stent include concise physical descriptions and documented complications, intended to serve as a guide for the investigating pathologist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.