Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16048922›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Efficacy of the combination rifampin-streptomycin in preventing growth of Mycobacterium ulcerans in early lesions of Buruli ulcer in humans.

S Etuaful, B Carbonnelle, J Grosset, S Lucas, C Horsfield, R Phillips, M Evans, D Ofori-Adjei, E Klustse, J Owusu-Boateng and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00321178 (Randomised Trial for Early Lesions Caused by M. Ulcerans - Comparison Between 8 Weeks Streptomycin and Rifampicin), which is not on this map. Cited by 100 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00321178 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Randomised Trial for Early Lesions Caused by M. Ulcerans - Comparison Between 8 Weeks Streptomycin and Rifampicin (SR), or 4 Weeks SR Followed by 4 Weeks R Plus Clarithromycin

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Center GroningenRan2006 to 2009Enrolled151ConditionsBuruli Ulcer, Mycobacterium UlceransArmsSR4 - switch to CR4
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Drugs for treating Buruli ulcer (Mycobacterium ulcerans disease).The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Buruli ulcer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Unlocking Opportunities forACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. New global targets for NTDs in the WHO roadmap 2021-2030.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pharmacologic management ofExpert review of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  18. The Many Hosts of Mycobacteria 8 (MHM8): A conference report.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. In Vivo Imaging of BioluminescentThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

S EtuafulSt. George's Hospital Medical School, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 0RE, United Kingdom. wansbrou@sghms.ac.uk
B Carbonnelle
J Grosset
S Lucas
C Horsfield
R Phillips
M Evans
D Ofori-Adjei
E Klustse
J Owusu-Boateng
G K Amedofu
P Awuah
E Ampadu
G Amofah
K Asiedu
M Wansbrough-Jones

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycobacterium ulcerans disease is common in some humid tropical areas, particularly in parts of West Africa, and current management is by surgical excision of skin lesions ranging from early nodules to extensive ulcers (Buruli ulcer). Antibiotic therapy would be more accessible to patients in areas of Buruli ulcer endemicity. We report a study of the efficacy of antibiotics in converting early lesions (nodules and plaques) from culture positive to culture negative. Lesions were excised either immediately or after treatment with rifampin orally at 10 mg/kg of body weight and streptomycin intramuscularly at 15 mg/kg of body weight daily for 2, 4, 8, or 12 weeks and examined by quantitative bacterial culture, PCR, and histopathology for M. ulcerans. Lesions were measured during treatment. Five lesions excised without antibiotic treatment and five lesions treated with antibiotics for 2 weeks were culture positive, whereas three lesions treated for 4 weeks, five treated for 8 weeks, and three treated for 12 weeks were culture negative. No lesions became enlarged during antibiotic treatment, and most became smaller. Treatment with rifampin and streptomycin for 4 weeks or more inhibited growth of M. ulcerans in human tissue, and it provides a basis for proceeding to a trial of antibiotic therapy as an alternative to surgery for early M. ulcerans disease.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium ulceransRifampinSkin Diseases, BacterialSkin UlcerStreptomycinTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsRifampinStreptomycin

Identifiers

PMID16048922
PMCPMC1196249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.