Trial reportPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2005
Long-term results of two unconventional agents in steroid-dependent nephrotic children.
Trial report in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive medications for steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Corticosteroid therapy for nephrotic syndrome in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome: new guidelines from KDIGO.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2013Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of levamisole in childhood nephrotic syndrome: A meta-analysis.Indian journal of pharmacologyPooled it
- Steroid sparing effect of a herbal preparation in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2006Trial
- Levamisole in Children with Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome: Clinical Efficacy and Pathophysiological Aspects.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Article
- Long-term efficacy and safety of common steroid-sparing agents in idiopathic nephrotic children.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2017Article
- How randomised trials have improved the care of children with kidney disease.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2016Review
- Levamisole therapy in children with frequently relapsing and steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a single-center experience.Central-European journal of immunology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children with steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome are prone to serious steroid side effects. Alternative therapies, such as oral cyclophosphamide, may also have serious side effects. We conducted this novel prospective study to compare the long-term efficacies of levamisole and I.V. pulse cyclophosphamide as therapies with potentially fewer side effects. This study included 40 children with idiopathic steroid-dependent minimal change nephrotic syndrome (age 3-15 years; 31 boys and 9 girls). The patients were randomized into two equal groups. One group received levamisole 2.5 mg/kg on alternate days (levamisole group) while the other group received I.V. cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2/month for six months (cyclophosphamide group). Prednisolone was gradually withdrawn. After stopping treatment, the number of patients that maintained remission was five (25%) in each group at six months, four (20%) versus two (10%) at one year and three (15%) versus one (5%) at two years in the levamisole and cyclophosphamide groups respectively, and one (5%) in each group at three and four years. The overall side effects were mild and both drugs were well tolerated. In view of the results, we recommend trial of levamisole before adopting other therapies with more serious side effects in such patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.