Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16047138›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Drug-drug interactions among recently hospitalised patients--frequent but mostly clinically insignificant.

Bente Glintborg, Stig Ejdrup Andersen, Kim Dalhoff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00738816 (The Effect of Systematic Medication Review in Elderly Patients Admitted to an Orthopedic Department.), which is not on this map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00738816 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2009, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Systematic Medication Review in Elderly Patients Admitted to an Orthopedic Department.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAarhus University HospitalRan2009 to 2010Enrolled108ConditionsElderlyArmsSystematic medication review and advisory notes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug-drug interactions in inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran: a systematic review of the literature.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Drug-Drug-Gene Interactions in Cardiovascular Medicine.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Understanding and preventing drug-drug and drug-gene interactions.Expert review of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence of drug interactions in hospital healthcare.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2012
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bente GlintborgClinic of Internal Medicine I, H:S Bispebjerg Hospital, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. bente.glintborg@rh.hosp.dk
Stig Ejdrup Andersen
Kim Dalhoff
Bispebjerg Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients use and store considerable amounts of drugs. The aim of the present study was to identify potential drug-drug interactions between drugs used by patients recently discharged from the hospital and, subsequently, to estimate the clinical implications of these interactions.

methodsPatients were visited within 1 week following their discharge from hospital and interviewed about their drug use. Stored products were inspected. We used a bibliography (Hansten and Horn; Wolters Kluwer Health, St. Louis, Mo., 2004) to identify and classify potential drug-drug interactions.

resultsIn total, 83 surgical and 117 medical patients (n = 200) were included in the survey, of which 139 (70%) were women. The median age was 75 years (range: 24-100 years). Patients stored 2119 medications at home (median: nine per patient; range: 2-44) and used 1622 medications daily or on demand (median: eight per patient; range: 1-24). With respect to those drugs used daily or on demand, 476 potential interactions were identified (126 patients); none were class 1 (always avoid drug combination) and 25 were class 2 (usually avoid combination; 24 patients). Eleven of the potential class 2 interactions involved over-the-counter products (aspirin and ginkgo biloba). Of the 52 drugs involved in potential class 2 interactions, 50 had been used for more than 1 month. According to the hospital case notes, none of the potential class 2 interactions had actually caused adverse effects.

conclusionAlthough potential drug-drug interactions are highly prevalent, serious and clinically significant interactions are rare among recently hospitalised patients.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsHospitalizationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overData CollectionDrug TherapyFemaleHouse CallsHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID16047138
OpenAlexW2024943732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.