ArticleTobacco control2005
Smoking cessation treatment in primary care: prospective cohort study.
Article in Tobacco control, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- An observational study of system-level changes to improve the recording of very brief advice for smoking cessation in an inpatient mental health setting.BMC public health · 2020Observational
- Appalachian disparities in tobacco cessation treatment utilization in Medicaid.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2020Article
- Smoking cessation support for regular smokers in Hungarian primary care: a nationwide representative cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2018Article
- Article
- Feasibility of offering nicotine replacement therapy as a relapse prevention treatment in routine smoking cessation services.BMC health services research · 2013Article
- The Emergency Department Action in Smoking Cessation (EDASC) trial: impact on delivery of smoking cessation counseling.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2012Article
- Smoking and health-related quality of life in English general population: implications for economic evaluations.BMC public health · 2012Article
- Costs and benefits of smoking cessation aids: making a case for public reimbursement of nicotine replacement therapy in Australia.Tobacco control · 2007Article
- Motivational interviewing for smokers.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Article
- Drugs to support smoking cessation in UK general practice: are evidence based guidelines being followed?Quality & safety in health care · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the characteristics of smokers who do and do not receive smoking cessation treatment in primary care.
designProspective cohort study using practices registered with the pilot QRESEARCH database.
setting156,550 patients aged 18 years and over from 39 general practices located within four strategic health authorities, representing the former Trent Region, UK. SUBJECTS: Patients registered with practices between 1 April 2001 and 31 March 2003 aged 18 years and over who were identified as smokers before the two year study period. OUTCOME: Prescription for smoking cessation treatment (nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or bupropion) in the two year study period. VARIABLES: Age, sex, deprivation score, co-morbidity.
resultsOf the 29,492 patients recorded as current smokers at the start of the study period 1892 (6.4%) were given prescriptions for smoking cessation treatment during the subsequent two years. Of these, 1378 (72.8%) were given NRT alone, 406 (21.5%) bupropion alone, and 108 (5.7%) both treatments. Smokers were more likely to receive smoking cessation treatment if they lived in the most deprived areas (odds ratio (OR) for the most relative to the least deprived fifth, adjusted for sex, age, and co-morbidity, 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26 to 1.78), and if they were aged 25-74 years compared to 18-24 years or 75 and over. Smokers with co-morbidity were also more likely to receive smoking cessation treatment. Smokers were less likely to receive smoking cessation treatment if they were male (adjusted OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.75).
conclusionThe low proportion of smokers being prescribed these products strongly suggests that a major public health opportunity to prevent smoking related illness is being missed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.