Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16044243›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2005

Actin phylogeny and intron distribution in bangiophyte red algae(rhodoplantae).

Kerstin Hoef-Emden, Roshan Prakash Shrestha, Miri Lapidot, Yacob Weinstein, Michael Melkonian, Shoshana Malis Arad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genome structure and metabolic features in the red seaweed Chondrus crispus shed light on evolution of the Archaeplastida.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  5. Actin gene family dynamics in cryptomonads and red algae.Journal of molecular evolution · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Kerstin Hoef-EmdenUniversität zu Köln, Botanisches Institut, Lehrstuhl I, Gyrhofstr. 15, Köln, 50931, Germany. kerstin.hoef-emden@uni-koeln.de
Roshan Prakash Shrestha
Miri Lapidot
Yacob Weinstein
Michael Melkonian
Shoshana Malis Arad
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev · ILInstitute of Botany · AZUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular phylogeny of red algal actin genes, with emphasis on the paraphyletic "Bangiophyceae," was examined and compared to the rhodophyte SSU rDNA phylogeny. Nineteen new genomic actin sequences and seven SSU rDNA sequences were obtained and subjected to diverse phylogenetic analyses (maximum likelihood, distance/neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony, Bayesian analyses, and, with respect to protein sequences, also quartet puzzling). The actin trees confirmed most of the major clades found in the SSU rDNA phylogenies, although with a lower resolution. An actin gene duplication in the florideophycean lineage is reported, presumably related to an increased complexity of sexual reproduction. In addition, the distribution and characteristics of spliceosomal introns found in some of the actin sequences were examined. Introns were found in almost all florideophycean actin genes, whereas only two bangiophyte sequences contained introns. One intron in the florideophycean actin genes was also found in metazoan, and, shifted by one or two nucleotides, in a glaucocystophyte, a cryptophyte, and two fungal actin genes, and thus may be an ancient intron.

Indexed as

PhylogenyActinsDNA, RibosomalGenes, FungalGenomicsIntronsRhodophytaActinsDNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID16044243
OpenAlexW2032773649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.