Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16043495›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2005

Evolvability of the mode of peptide binding by an RNA.

Tetsuya Iwazaki, Xianglan Li, Kazuo Harada

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. A Review: The Antiviral Activity of Cyclic Peptides.International journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The new (dis)order in RNA regulation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2016
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Non-coding RNA as a trigger of neuropathologic disorder phenotypes in transgenic Drosophila.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2008
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tetsuya IwazakiDepartment of Life Science, Tokyo Gakugei University, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8501, Japan.
Xianglan Li
Kazuo Harada
Tokyo Gakugei University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The HIV Rev-response element (RRE) RNA binds strongly to two unrelated peptides, the HIV Rev peptide and an RRE-binding aptamer, the RSG-1.2 peptide, at a similar site, but using distinct sets of interactions. In this study, the nucleotide base requirements for the binding of the RRE to the Rev and RSG-1.2 peptides were determined by selection of Rev- and RSG-1.2-binding RRE variants using a bacterial reporter system. As a result, distinct differences in the bases necessary for binding the two peptides were found in the upper stem of the RRE. Strikingly, single nucleotide changes in this region were found to switch the peptide-binding specificity of the RRE from a bifunctional Rev- and RSG-1.2-binding mode to either a Rev-specific or a RSG-1.2- specific mode, demonstrating how an RNA can evolve alternative binding strategies in discrete steps without intermediate loss of function. This evolvability of the mode of peptide binding by an RNA presumably reflects the multidimensionality of conformational space that a given RNA has available for ligand recognition, which may have been utilized in the evolution of RNA-polypeptide complexes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenes, envElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayHIVHumansNucleic Acid ConformationPeptidesPlasmidsProtein BindingRNAPeptidesRNA

Identifiers

PMID16043495
PMCPMC1370820
OpenAlexW2036500314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.