Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16043493›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2005

Transcript selection and the recruitment of mRNA decay factors for NMD in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Michael R Culbertson, Eric Neeno-Eckwall

Abstract readLetterReviewComment
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael R Culbertson
Eric Neeno-Eckwall

Funding

The NMD pathway in RNA surveillance and gene expressionR01GM065172 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON · PI CULBERTSON, MICHAEL R · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM65172NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) requires Upf1p, Upf2p, and Upf3p to accelerate the decay rate of two unique classes of transcripts: (1) nonsense mRNAs that arise through errors in gene expression, and (2) naturally occurring transcripts that lack coding errors but have built-in features that target them for accelerated decay (error-free mRNAs). NMD can trigger decay during any round of translation and can target Cbc-bound or eIF-4E-bound transcripts. Extremely low concentrations of the Upf proteins relative to the total pool of transcripts make it difficult to understand how nonsense transcripts are selectively recruited. To stimulate debate, we propose two alternative mechanisms for selecting nonsense transcripts for NMD and for assembling components of the surveillance complex, one for the first (pioneer) round of translation, called "nuclear marking," and the other for subsequent rounds, called "reverse assembly." The model is designed to accommodate (1) the low abundance of NMD factors, (2) the role of nucleocytoplasmic shuttling proteins in NMD, (3) the independent and nonobligate order of assembly of two different subcomplexes of NMD factors, and (4) the ability of NMD to simultaneously reduce or eliminate the synthesis of truncated proteins produced by nonsense transcripts while down-regulating but not completely eliminating functional proteins produced from error-free NMD-sensitive transcripts

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAnimalsCodon, NonsenseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerRNA Processing, Post-TranscriptionalSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCodon, NonsenseRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID16043493
PMCPMC1370816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.