Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16043343›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2005

Molecular dynamics simulations of proteins in lipid bilayers.

James Gumbart, Yi Wang, Alekseij Aksimentiev, Emad Tajkhorshid, Klaus Schulten

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Preparing Membrane Proteins for Simulation Using CHARMM-GUI.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James GumbartTheoretical and Computational Biophysics Group, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Yi Wang
Alekseij Aksimentiev
Emad Tajkhorshid
Klaus Schulten
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

WHOLE CELL SIMULATIONP41RR005969 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI STONE, JOHN H · 1990 to 2011
$19.8M
NCRR NIH HHS 5P41 RR 05969NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR005969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With recent advances in X-ray crystallography of membrane proteins promising many new high-resolution structures, molecular dynamics simulations will become increasingly valuable for understanding membrane protein function, as they can reveal the dynamic behavior concealed in the static structures. Dramatic increases in computational power, in synergy with more efficient computational methodologies, now allow us to carry out molecular dynamics simulations of any structurally known membrane protein in its native environment, covering timescales of up to 0.1 micros. At the frontiers of membrane protein simulations are ion channels, aquaporins, passive and active transporters, and bioenergetic proteins.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationIon ChannelsLipid BilayersMembrane ProteinsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationIon ChannelsLipid BilayersMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16043343
PMCPMC2474857
OpenAlexW2014588856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.