Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16042785›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2005

Application of Affymetrix array and Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing for identification of genes involved in prostate cancer progression.

Asa J Oudes, Jared C Roach, Laura S Walashek, Lillian J Eichner, Lawrence D True, Robert L Vessella, Alvin Y Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. DNA methylation in promoter region as biomarkers in prostate cancer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Promoter hypermethylation in prostate cancer.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer Center · 2010
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Asa J OudesInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, USA. aoudes@systemsbiology.org
Jared C Roach
Laura S Walashek
Lillian J Eichner
Lawrence D True
Robert L Vessella
Alvin Y Liu
Seattle University · USUniversity of Washington · USInstitute for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Transmembrane Proteases and Prostate CarcinogenesisP01CA085859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VESSELLA, ROBERT LOUIS · 2002 to 2013
$21.2M
Urologic Epithelial Stem CellsU01DK063630 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2002 to 2004
$2.4M
CD Expression in Prostate CancerR21CA098699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2003 to 2004
$301k
NCI NIH HHS CA85859NCI NIH HHS CA98699NCI NIH HHS P01 CA085859NCI NIH HHS R21 CA098699NIDDK NIH HHS DK63630NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK063630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAffymetrix GeneChip Array and Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (MPSS) are two high throughput methodologies used to profile transcriptomes. Each method has certain strengths and weaknesses; however, no comparison has been made between the data derived from Affymetrix arrays and MPSS. In this study, two lineage-related prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and C4-2, were used for transcriptome analysis with the aim of identifying genes associated with prostate cancer progression.

methodsAffymetrix GeneChip array and MPSS analyses were performed. Data was analyzed with GeneSpring 6.2 and in-house perl scripts. Expression array results were verified with RT-PCR.

resultsComparison of the data revealed that both technologies detected genes the other did not. In LNCaP, 3,180 genes were only detected by Affymetrix and 1,169 genes were only detected by MPSS. Similarly, in C4-2, 4,121 genes were only detected by Affymetrix and 1,014 genes were only detected by MPSS. Analysis of the combined transcriptomes identified 66 genes unique to LNCaP cells and 33 genes unique to C4-2 cells. Expression analysis of these genes in prostate cancer specimens showed CA1 to be highly expressed in bone metastasis but not expressed in primary tumor and EPHA7 to be expressed in normal prostate and primary tumor but not bone metastasis.

conclusionOur data indicates that transcriptome profiling with a single methodology will not fully assess the expression of all genes in a cell line. A combination of transcription profiling technologies such as DNA array and MPSS provides a more robust means to assess the expression profile of an RNA sample. Finally, genes that were differentially expressed in cell lines were also differentially expressed in primary prostate cancer and its metastases.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyDisease ProgressionGene Expression ProfilingHumansMaleModels, StatisticalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisProstatic NeoplasmsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSoftwareTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID16042785
PMCPMC1187880
OpenAlexW2130039362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.