ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005
Comparison of information on the pharmacokinetic interactions of Ca antagonists in the package inserts from three countries (Japan, USA and UK).
Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An evaluation of the completeness of drug-drug interaction-related information in package inserts.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2017Article
- Old habits die hard: a nationwide utilization study of short-acting nifedipine in Taiwan.PloS one · 2014Article
- Potential of pharmacokinetic profiling for detecting herbal interactions with drugs.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2008Review
- Comparative assessment of four drug interaction compendia.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCa antagonists are one of the most popular classes of drugs used to treat hypertension and angina. These drugs may interact with either CYP3A4 or MDR-1 substrates, with the degree of interaction differing with each drug. We carried out a literature search to examine and compare the extent to which crucial pharmacokinetic (PK) information is included in package inserts (PIs) in Japan, USA and the UK.
methodsA MEDLINE search from 1966 to November 2004 was undertaken with the aim of identifying studies on clinical PK drug interactions between seven Ca antagonists that are available in three countries and three CYP3A4 inhibitors (erythromycin, itraconazole and cimetidine), a CYP3A4 inhibitory food, grapefruit juice (GFJ) and the MDR-1 substrate, digoxin. The current PIs for Ca antagonists were obtained from the website of the regulatory authorities or the electronic Medicines Compendium.
resultsOf all possible combinations of seven Ca antagonists with three CYP3A4 inhibitor drugs, drug interaction information was available in the literature on nine combinations: Seven of these were listed in the USA PIs, two in the UK PIs, and none in the Japanese PIs. Interaction studies with GFJ were reported for every Ca antagonist; PIs in the USA provided quantitative data for four of these interactions, whereas UK PIs provided quantitative data for only one of the interactions and Japanese PIs provided no quantitative information. The PK data of co-medication of digoxin with Ca antagonists have been reported for every Ca antagonists. The USA PIs provided quantitative data for five Ca antagonists, whereas the UK PIs provided quantitative data for three Ca antagonists and Japanese PIs provided no quantitative data.
conclusionThe literature search revealed that PIs in the USA provided a great deal of quantitative information on PK interactions between Ca antagonists and other drugs or GFJ. In contrast, PIs in the UK and Japan did not provide sufficient information. We conclude that crucial quantitative information on these drug interactions should be incorporated in PIs, especially in Japan and the UK, as a means of assisting healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16041596What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.