Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16041535›Full record

ReviewPsychopharmacology2005

Phenotypic studies on dopamine receptor subtype and associated signal transduction mutants: insights and challenges from 10 years at the psychopharmacology-molecular biology interface.

John L Waddington, Colm O'Tuathaigh, Gerard O'Sullivan, Katsunori Tomiyama, Noriaki Koshikawa, David T Croke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dopamine D4 receptors in psychostimulant addiction.Advances in pharmacology (San Diego, Calif.) · 2014
    Review
  6. D-amphetamine and antipsychotic drug effects on latent inhibition in mice lacking dopamine D2 receptors.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  7. Disease-specific heteromerization of G-protein-coupled receptors that target drugs of abuse.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2013
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurogenetics and pharmacology of learning, motivation, and cognition.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2011
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Genetic analysis of sleep.Genes & development · 2010
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John L WaddingtonInstitute of Biopharmaceutical Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. jwadding@rcsi.ie
Colm O'Tuathaigh
Gerard O'Sullivan
Katsunori Tomiyama
Noriaki Koshikawa
David T Croke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMutants with targeted gene deletion ('knockout') or insertion (transgenic) of D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 dopamine (DA) receptor subtypes are complemented by an increasing variety of double knockout and transgenic-'knockout' models, together with knockout of critical components of DA receptor signalling cascades such as G alpha(olf)[G gamma7], adenylyl cyclase type 5, PKA [RIIbeta] and DARPP-32. However, it is increasingly recognised that these molecular techniques have a number of inherent limitations. Furthermore, there are poorly understood methodological factors that contribute to inconsistent phenotypic findings between laboratories.

objectiveThis review seeks to document the impact of DA receptor subtype and related transduction mutants on our understanding of the behavioural roles of these entities, primarily at the level of unconditioned psychomotor behaviour.

methodsIt includes ethologically based and orofacial movement studies in our own laboratories, since these are the only studies to systematically compare each of the D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptor and DARPP-32 signal transduction 'knockouts'. DISCUSSION: There is a particular emphasis on identifying methodological factors that might influence phenotypic effects and account for inconsistencies. The findings are offered empirically to (1) specify the extent of phenotypic diversity among individual DA receptor subtypes and transduction components and (2) indicate relationships between D1, D2, D3, D4 and D5 receptor subtype proteins, associated G alpha(i)/G alpha(s)/G alpha(olf)[G gamma7]-adenylyl cyclase type 5-PKA [RIIbeta]-DARPP-32 signalling cascades and behaviour. The findings are also offered heuristically as a base for such phenotypic comparisons at additional levels of behaviour so that a yet more complete phenotypic profile might emerge.

Indexed as

DNA Mutational AnalysisPhenotypeAdenylyl CyclasesAnimalsArousalHumansMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicModels, GeneticMotor ActivityPsychomotor PerformanceRatsReceptors, DopamineSignal TransductionAdenylyl CyclasesReceptors, Dopamine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.