SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2005
Systematic review of specialist palliative day-care for adults with cancer.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Models, components and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic umbrella review of reviews.Palliative medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of out-of-hours palliative care: a systematic review.HRB open research · 2020Pooled it
- A new model of early, integrated palliative care: palliative rehabilitation for newly diagnosed patients with non-resectable cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019Trial
- Trial
- Structures and objectives of day hospices - Design of a logic model.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Influence of a day hospice on the quality of life of palliative care patients: an interview-based qualitative survey.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Development of a quality indicator set for day hospices in Germany - a multi-stage, quality-assured review of German guidelines and quality indicator sets.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- A palliative care rapid access clinic reduces emergency department visits: a retrospective single centre analysis.BMC palliative care · 2025Observational
- Specialised Palliative Care in Day Clinic, Hospital Unit or at Home: Which for Whom and When? A Retrospective Routine Data Analysis.Health services insights · 2025Article
- Consensus-based recommendations for the development and expansion of palliative day care clinics in Germany: results of a Delphi study.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- The complex intervention day hospice - a quality-assured study on the implementation, realization, and benefits with model character for Germany (IMPULS) using the example of "Day hospice Adiuvantes".BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- Prevalence of radiotherapy, chemotherapy and access to supportive care in cancer in Brazil, China, France, Russia and the USA.European journal of cancer care · 2022Article
- Exploring the status of and demand for palliative day-care clinics and day hospices in Germany: a protocol for a mixed-methods study.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- Evidence on the economic value of end-of-life and palliative care interventions: a narrative review of reviews.BMC palliative care · 2021Review
- Challenges for palliative care day services: a focus group study.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- "The way I am treated is as if I am under my mother's care": qualitative study of patients' experiences of receiving hospice care services in South Africa.BMC palliative care · 2020Article
- Models of Palliative Care Delivery for Patients With Cancer.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2020Review
- Identifying models of delivery, care domains and quality indicators relevant to palliative day services: a scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2017Article
- A cost-utility analysis of a rehabilitation service for people living with and beyond cancer.BMC health services research · 2014Article
- Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review.BMC health services research · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
goal of workTo inform future practice, research and policy in specialist palliative day-care by systematically reviewing the evidence for how the structure and process of this form of care relate to outcomes for adults with cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsMedical, nursing and social science computerized databases were searched up until December 2003 for studies of palliative day-care reporting information on service structure, care processes or outcomes including symptom control, quality of life, social and psychological support, and patient and relative satisfaction with care. Qualitative and quantitative studies were assessed for methodological quality and graded, and the findings synthesized into the review. MAIN
resultsTwelve observational studies were found that showed the difficulties of evaluating a service already operating and of recruiting a vulnerable population of patients as they deteriorated. Most services are nurse-led, but varied in the facilities, staff mix, care models, activities and places they offered. Patients attending seemed a selected group of those already receiving palliative care who were mostly white, aged over 60 years and retired, with needs for emotional and social support and pain control. There were insufficient studies to provide conclusive evidence of improved symptom control or health-related quality of life, but all qualitative studies found patients valued the social support and opportunity to take part in activities that day-care provided.
conclusionsThere is evidence for high satisfaction among patients selected into day-care, but not yet sufficient to judge whether this improves symptom control or health-related quality of life. Further research should explore selection and access into care, the most effective models of care, its cost, and potential benefits for relatives and carers. Comparison with models of care for older adults and those with mental illness would also be informative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16041463What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.