Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16041210›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2005

Association of adult celiac disease with surgical abdominal pain: a case-control study in patients referred to secondary care.

David S Sanders, Andrew D Hopper, Iman A F Azmy, Nahida Rahman, David P Hurlstone, John S Leeds, Rina R George, Neeraj Bhala

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Celiac disease and non-celiac gluten sensitivity.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2015
    Review
  4. Cost Effectiveness of Routine Duodenal Biopsy Analysis for Celiac Disease During Endoscopy for Gastroesophageal Reflux.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2015
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Adult coeliac disease.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does coeliac disease affect colorectal practice?International journal of colorectal disease · 2007
    Review
  12. Article
  13. A new insight into non-specific abdominal pain.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David S SandersDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. d.s.sanders28@btopenworld.com
Andrew D Hopper
Iman A F Azmy
Nahida Rahman
David P Hurlstone
John S Leeds
Rina R George
Neeraj Bhala
Royal Hallamshire Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute abdominal pain is the most common indication for surgical admission. Nonspecific abdominal pain (NSAP) may account for up to 40% of cases. There has been no published prospective study in which adult patients presenting with acute abdominal pain are investigated for celiac disease.

aimsWe aimed to assess the association of celiac disease with surgical abdominal pain. PATIENTS AND

methodsA case-control study was undertaken involving 300 consecutive new unselected patients presenting with acute abdominal pain (in a university hospital) and healthy controls (age and sex matched) without abdominal pain (n = 300). Initial investigations for celiac disease were immunoglobulins, IgA/IgG anti-gliadin (AGA), and endomysial antibodies (EMA). Any patient with a positive IgA AGA, EMA, or only IgG AGA in the presence of IgA deficiency was offered a small bowel biopsy to confirm the diagnosis.

results: There were 33 patients with abdominal pain who had positive antibodies, of whom 9 had histologically confirmed celiac disease (6 EMA positive; 3 EMA negative). One antibody positive patient (EMA in isolation) declined duodenal biopsy and the remaining 23 had normal duodenal mucosa. Within the control group, there were 2 cases of celiac disease. Compared with matched controls the association of acute abdominal pain with celiac disease gave an odds ratio 4.6. (P = 0.068, 95% confidence interval, 1.11-19.05). When only considering NSAP the prevalence of celiac disease was highly significant at 10.5% (9 of 86, P = 0.006). Patients' symptoms improved on a gluten-free diet at 12- to 18-month follow-up.

conclusionCeliac disease was diagnosed in 3% of patients who presented with unselected acute abdominal pain to secondary care. Targeting patients who have NSAP or celiac associated symptoms/diseases may improve the diagnostic yield.

Indexed as

Abdomen, AcuteAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCeliac DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID16041210
PMCPMC1357725
OpenAlexW2065375131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.