Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16041052›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2005

Protection against aerosolized Yersinia pestis challenge following homologous and heterologous prime-boost with recombinant plague antigens.

Audrey Glynn, Chad J Roy, Bradford S Powell, Jeffrey J Adamovicz, Lucy C Freytag, John D Clements

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Animal modelling with theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Virulence and genome analysis of three historicalFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  3. The rLVS ΔHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2023
    Article
  4. Complete Protection AgainstFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Cationic liposome-hyaluronic acid hybrid nanoparticles for intranasal vaccination with subunit antigens.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Audrey GlynnDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Program in Molecular Pathogenesis and Immunity, 1430 Tulane Avenue, Tulane University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA.
Chad J Roy
Bradford S Powell
Jeffrey J Adamovicz
Lucy C Freytag
John D Clements

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A Yersinia pestis-derived fusion protein (F1-V) has shown great promise as a protective antigen against aerosol challenge with Y. pestis in murine studies. In the current study, we examined different prime-boost regimens with F1-V and demonstrate that (i) boosting by a route other than the route used for the priming dose (heterologous boosting) protects mice as well as homologous boosting against aerosol challenge with Y. pestis, (ii) parenteral immunization is not required to protect mice against aerosolized plague challenge, (iii) the route of immunization and choice of adjuvant influence the magnitude of the antibody response as well as the immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1)/IgG2a ratio, and (iv) inclusion of an appropriate adjuvant is critical for nonparenteral immunization.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodiesAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesBronchoalveolar Lavage FluidImmunization, SecondaryMicePlagueRecombinant ProteinsTime FactorsYersinia pestisAntibodiesAntigens, BacterialBacterial VaccinesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16041052
PMCPMC1201190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.