Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16041002›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2005

Fsr-independent production of protease(s) may explain the lack of attenuation of an Enterococcus faecalis fsr mutant versus a gelE-sprE mutant in induction of endocarditis.

Kavindra V Singh, Sreedhar R Nallapareddy, Esteban C Nannini, Barbara E Murray

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Insights into ecology, pathogenesis, and biofilm formation ofMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  3. Role of theApplied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Targeting pili in enterococcal pathogenesis.Infection and immunity · 2014
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Enterococcal endocarditis: can we win the war?Current infectious disease reports · 2012
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kavindra V SinghDivision of Infectious Diseases, Center for the Study of Emerging and Re-emerging Pathogens, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, 6431 Fannin, 2.112 MSB, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Sreedhar R Nallapareddy
Esteban C Nannini
Barbara E Murray

Funding

ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES FOR E FAECALIS INFECTIONSR37AI047923 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MURRAY, BARBARA E · 2000 to 2009
$4.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI047923NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI 47923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An Enterococcus faecalis gelE insertion disruption mutant (TX5128), which produces neither gelatinase (GelE) nor the cotranscribed (in the wild type) serine protease (SprE), was found to be attenuated in a rat endocarditis model with a significant decrease in the endocarditis induction rate versus wild-type E. faecalis OG1RF (GelE(+), SprE(+)). TX5266, which has a nonpolar deletion in fsrB and, like TX5128, is phenotypically GelE(-) under usual conditions, was also studied; fsrB is a homologue of agrB of staphylococci and participates in regulation of gelE-sprE expression. Unexpectedly, TX5266 approximated wild-type OG1RF in the endocarditis model and was significantly less attenuated than TX5128. This is in contrast to other models which have found fsr mutants to be as or more attenuated than TX5128. Further study found that the fsrB mutant produced very low levels of gelatinase activity after prolonged incubation in vitro versus no gelatinase activity with TX5128 and did not show the extensive chaining characteristic of TX5128. Reverse transcription-PCR confirmed that gelE was expressed in TX5266 at a very low level versus wild-type OG1RF and was not expressed at all in TX5128. Possible explanations for the increased induction of endocarditis by TX5266 versus TX5128 include the production of low levels of protease(s) or some other effect(s) of the inactivation of the E. faecalis fsr regulator. The equivalent ability of OG1RF and its fsr mutant to initiate endocarditis may explain why we did not find naturally occurring fsr mutants, which account for ca. 35% of E. faecalis isolates, unrepresented in endocarditis versus fecal isolates.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsEndocarditis, BacterialEnterococcus faecalisGelatinasesGene Expression Regulation, BacterialMutationRatsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSerine EndopeptidasesBacterial ProteinsFsrB protein, EnterococcusGelatinasesSerine Endopeptidases

Identifiers

PMID16041002
PMCPMC1201275
OpenAlexW2141566122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.