Ethics committees and countries in transition: a figleaf for structural violence?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. ETHICAL REVIEW OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH IN BELARUS: CURRENT STATUS, PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES.Revista romana de bioetica · 2011
   Article
2. Bioethics training in Uganda: report on research and clinical ethics workshops.HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2011
   Article
3. Non-equivalent stringency of ethical review in the Baltic States: a sign of a systematic problem in Europe?Journal of medical ethics · 2010
   Article
4. Regulation of healthcare ethics committees in Europe.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2007
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia.2005

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as