ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005
Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of Function Determining and Buried Residues Through Analysis of Saturation Mutagenesis Datasets.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Article
- Prediction of detailed enzyme functions and identification of specificity determining residues by random forests.PloS one · 2014Article
- Predicting protein-ATP binding sites from primary sequence through fusing bi-profile sampling of multi-view features.BMC bioinformatics · 2012Article
- Computational approaches for rational design of proteins with novel functionalities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2012Review
- Article
- FFAS server: novel features and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2011Article
- Using shifts in amino acid frequency and substitution rate to identify latent structural characters in base-excision repair enzymes.PloS one · 2011Article
- Computational protein design: validation and possible relevance as a tool for homology searching and fold recognition.PloS one · 2010Article
- Fast and automated functional classification with MED-SuMo: an application on purine-binding proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2010Article
- Active site prediction using evolutionary and structural information.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2010Article
- Analysis of nucleoside-binding proteins by ligand-specific elution from dye resin: application to Mycobacterium tuberculosis aldehyde dehydrogenases.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2009Article
- Missing in action: enzyme functional annotations in biological databases.Nature chemical biology · 2009Article
- Structural and phylogenetic analysis of a conserved actinobacteria-specific protein (ASP1; SCO1997) from Streptomyces coelicolor.BMC structural biology · 2009Article
- Article
- Protein function annotation by homology-based inference.Genome biology · 2009Review
- Protein-DNA interactions: structural, thermodynamic and clustering patterns of conserved residues in DNA-binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Bridging protein local structures and protein functions.Amino acids · 2008Review
- E1DS: catalytic site prediction based on 1D signatures of concurrent conservation.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Characterization and prediction of residues determining protein functional specificity.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2008Article
- Evolution of function in the "two dinucleotide binding domains" flavoproteins.PLoS computational biology · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of the extreme impact of genome sequencing projects, protein sequences without accompanying experimental data now dominate public databases. Homology searches, by providing an opportunity to transfer functional information between related proteins, have become the de facto way to address this. Although a single, well annotated, close relationship will often facilitate sufficient annotation, this situation is not always the case, particularly if mutations are present in important functional residues. When only distant relationships are available, the transfer of function information is more tenuous, and the likelihood of encountering several well annotated proteins with different functions is increased. The consequence for a researcher is a range of candidate functions with little way of knowing which, if any, are correct. Here, we address the problem directly by introducing a computational approach to accurately identify and segregate related proteins into those with a functional similarity and those where function differs. This approach should find a wide range of applications, including the interpretation of genomics/proteomics data and the prioritization of targets for high-throughput structure determination. The method is generic, but here we concentrate on enzymes and apply high-quality catalytic site data. In addition to providing a series of comprehensive benchmarks to show the overall performance of our approach, we illustrate its utility with specific examples that include the correct identification of haptoglobin as a nonenzymatic relative of trypsin, discrimination of acid-d-amino acid ligases from a much larger ligase pool, and the successful annotation of BioH, a structural genomics target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.