Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16037208›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Effective function annotation through catalytic residue conservation.

Richard A George, Ruth V Spriggs, Gail J Bartlett, Alex Gutteridge, Malcolm W MacArthur, Craig T Porter, Bissan Al-Lazikani, Janet M Thornton, Mark B Swindells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Computational approaches for rational design of proteins with novel functionalities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2012
    Review
  5. Article
  6. FFAS server: novel features and applications.Nucleic acids research · 2011
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Richard A GeorgeInpharmatica, 60 Charlotte Street, London W1T 2NU, United Kingdom.
Ruth V Spriggs
Gail J Bartlett
Alex Gutteridge
Malcolm W MacArthur
Craig T Porter
Bissan Al-Lazikani
Janet M Thornton
Mark B Swindells

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the extreme impact of genome sequencing projects, protein sequences without accompanying experimental data now dominate public databases. Homology searches, by providing an opportunity to transfer functional information between related proteins, have become the de facto way to address this. Although a single, well annotated, close relationship will often facilitate sufficient annotation, this situation is not always the case, particularly if mutations are present in important functional residues. When only distant relationships are available, the transfer of function information is more tenuous, and the likelihood of encountering several well annotated proteins with different functions is increased. The consequence for a researcher is a range of candidate functions with little way of knowing which, if any, are correct. Here, we address the problem directly by introducing a computational approach to accurately identify and segregate related proteins into those with a functional similarity and those where function differs. This approach should find a wide range of applications, including the interpretation of genomics/proteomics data and the prioritization of targets for high-throughput structure determination. The method is generic, but here we concentrate on enzymes and apply high-quality catalytic site data. In addition to providing a series of comprehensive benchmarks to show the overall performance of our approach, we illustrate its utility with specific examples that include the correct identification of haptoglobin as a nonenzymatic relative of trypsin, discrimination of acid-d-amino acid ligases from a much larger ligase pool, and the successful annotation of BioH, a structural genomics target.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAnimalsCatalytic DomainConserved SequenceDatabases, ProteinEnzymesGenomicsHaptoglobinsHumansMolecular Sequence DataProteinsProteomicsSequence Homology, Amino AcidTrypsinEnzymesHaptoglobinsProteinsTrypsin

Identifiers

PMID16037208
PMCPMC1178014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.