Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16036888›Full record

SynthesisArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2005

Palivizumab for preterm infants. Is it worth it?

N D Embleton, C Harkensee, M C Mckean

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Viral bronchiolitis for the clinician.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2011
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Management of bronchiolitis.Paediatrics and child health · 2009
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute bronchiolitis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N D EmbletonNewcastle Neonatal Service, Department of Child Health, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK. n.d.embleton@ncl.ac.uk
C Harkensee
M C Mckean
Royal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory syncytial virus infection is an important cause of morbidity. Although palivizumab prophylaxis is widely used, it is uncertain whether the cost is justified. A systematic review was therefore performed of the safety, efficacy, and the likely cost effectiveness of prophylaxis for preterm infants in the United Kingdom using a standard search strategy. The only randomised controlled trial identified showed a reduction in hospital admission but no benefit on more serious outcomes. None of the United Kingdom cost studies showed economic benefit for palivizumab prophylaxis. New treatments are rarely cost effective, and, in the absence of a comprehensive economic assessment, continued use for high risk infants may appear justified.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisHospitalizationHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureInfant, Premature, DiseasesPalivizumabRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Syncytial Virus InfectionsTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntiviral AgentsPalivizumab

Identifiers

PMID16036888
PMCPMC1721903
OpenAlexW2121553862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.