Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16036277›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2005

Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system.

Nathan K Cobb, Amanda L Graham, Beth C Bock, George Papandonatos, David B Abrams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 114 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
114citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

114 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Improving Adherence to Smoking Cessation Treatment: Intervention Effects in a Web-Based Randomized Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2017
    Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Predictors of Utilization of a Novel Smoking Cessation Smartphone App.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2015
    Trial
  15. Use of an online smoking cessation community promotes abstinence: Results of propensity score weighting.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2015
    Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Internet and Telephone Treatment for smoking cessation: mediators and moderators of short-term abstinence.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Use of non-assigned interventions in a randomized trial of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Trial

54 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan K CobbBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Amanda L Graham
Beth C Bock
George Papandonatos
David B Abrams

Funding

Statistical Sciences CoreP50CA084719 · NCI · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI PAPANDONATOS, GEORGE DENNIS · 1999 to 2008
$17.8M
Internet and Telephone Treatment for Smoking CessationR01CA104836 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI GRAHAM, AMANDA L · 2004 to 2008
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS 1R43CA09790301A1NCI NIH HHS CA84719NCI NIH HHS P50 CA084719NCI NIH HHS R01 CA104836NCI NIH HHS R43CA09921101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To significantly reduce smoking prevalence, treatments must balance reach, efficacy, and cost. The Internet can reach millions of smokers cost-effectively. Many cessation Web sites exist, but few have been evaluated. As a result, the potential impact of the Internet on smoking prevalence remains unknown. The present study reports the results, challenges, and limitations of a preliminary, large-scale evaluation of a broadly disseminated smoking cessation Web site used worldwide (QuitNet). Consecutive registrants (N=1,501) were surveyed 3 months after they registered on the Web site to assess 7-day point prevalence abstinence. Results must be interpreted cautiously because this is an uncontrolled study with a 25.6% response rate. Approximately 30% of those surveyed indicated they had already quit smoking at registration. Excluding these participants, an intention-to-treat analysis yielded 7% point prevalence abstinence (for the responders only, abstinence was 30%). A range of plausible cessation outcomes (9.8%-13.1%) among various subgroups is presented to illustrate the strengths and limitations of conducting Web-based evaluations, and the tensions between clinical and dissemination research methods. Process-to-outcome analyses indicated that sustained use of QuitNet, especially the use of social support, was associated with more than three times greater point prevalence abstinence and more than four times greater continuous abstinence. Despite its limitations, the present study provides useful information about the potential efficacy, challenging design and methodological issues, process-to-outcome mechanisms of action, and potential public health impact of Internet-based behavior change programs for smoking cessation.

Indexed as

Smoking PreventionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBehavior, AddictiveBehavior TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSmoking CessationSocial SupportTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID16036277
PMCPMC2885701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.