Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16036063›Full record

ReviewCurrent osteoporosis reports2003

How to grow bone to treat osteoporosis and mend fractures.

James F Whitfield

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current osteoporosis reports, 2003. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

James F WhitfieldInstitute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Montreal Road Campus, Building M-54, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada. pthosteo@rogers.com
Institute for Biological Sciences · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing number of patients with osteoporosis in our aging population need "anabolic" drugs to stimulate bone growth, improve bone microarchitecture, and accelerate fracture healing. Potent anabolic agents such as parathyroid hormone (PTH) and some of its adenylyl cyclase-stimulating fragments are either on their way, or have just now reached the clinic. This article discusses how PTHs might stimulate bone growth. The controversial bone anabolic activities of the widely used cholesterol-lowering lipophilic statins and how they might stimulate bone growth are also probed. Also, evidence is presented for leptin, a controller of body fat stores and the ovarian cycle. It has the remarkable property of being an anabolic and antianabolic that uses a hypothalamic factor to restrain osteoblast activity but by itself stimulates osteoblasts and inhibits osteoclasts.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesBone DevelopmentBone RemodelingDisease Models, AnimalDrug Therapy, CombinationFractures, SpontaneousHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLeptinOsteogenesisOsteoporosisParathyroid HormonePrognosisRisk AssessmentHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsLeptinParathyroid Hormone

Identifiers

PMID16036063
OpenAlexW3022516066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.