ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2005
The risks and benefits of aldosterone antagonists.
Review in Current heart failure reports, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effectiveness of Eplerenone vs Spironolactone on Left Ventricular Systolic Function, Hospitalization and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-HFrEF.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2023Trial
- Differential effects of eplerenone versus amlodipine on muscle metaboreflex function in hypertensive humans.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021Trial
- Eplerenone: a review of its use in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.Drugs · 2013Review
- Diuretic use in renal disease.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2011Review
- Endocrine causes of secondary hypertension.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2008Review
- A comparison of the aldosterone-blocking agents eplerenone and spironolactone.Clinical cardiology · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spironolactone and eplerenone are mineralocorticoid- blocking agents used for their ability to block a host of epithelial and nonepithelial actions of aldosterone. These compounds are of proven benefit in reducing blood pressure and urine protein excretion, and in conferring cardiovascular gain in diverse circumstances of heart failure. However, as enthusiasm grows for use of mineralocorticoid-blocking agents, the risks inherent to use of such drugs become more pertinent. Whereas the endocrine side effects of spironolactone are in reality little more than a cosmetic disfigurement, the potassium-sparing properties of spironolactone and eplerenone can prove life-threatening if hyperkalemia develops. However, for most patients the risk of developing hyperkalemia should not dissuade the prudent clinician from use of these compounds. Hyperkalemia should be considered as a possibility in any patient receiving these medications and as such is best addressed preemptively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.